Depends what you mean by “smart assistant”. Spew a bunch of trivia on a random subject? Sure. Understand your speech commands better? Maybe. Actually manage your stuff (meetings, reminders)? Nope.
ChatGPT is good at making up pieces of text that come very very close to what you wanted (more so in the spirit rather than the letter of it), but it’s not very good at anything else.
ChatGPT has potential to create meeting invitations. I asked it:
Today is 2023-08-07. I’m in Tokyo. Draft a calendar invitation for coffee meeting at Starbucks in Shibuya during lunch time on Wednesday. Answer in ics format.
It answered:
BEGIN:VCALENDARVERSION:2.0PRODID:-//ChatGPT//ENCALSCALE:GREGORIANBEGIN:VEVENTSUMMARY:CoffeeMeeting at StarbucksShibuyaLOCATION:StarbucksShibuya, TokyoDTSTART:20230809T120000
DTEND:20230809T130000
DESCRIPTION:Let's meet up for a coffee and chat at Starbucks in Shibuya during lunchtime.
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
Requires a bit of prompt engineering to make it work, but this can probably be improved with some fine tuning. All you need is something that detects and parses ics invitation in the output.
Sure it can output .ics but the question is, would you trust it to manage your calendar? To get every single meeting right?
Software at its core is a precision tool. When it goes wrong it was either made wrong or you used it wrong. But ML introduces another layer for which the software maker doesn’t want to take responsability, and you the user have no idea if you’re using it right. When it fails there’s “nobody to blame” yet you’re the one left holding the bag.
With fundamentally flawed software like this (ambiguous by design) it’s fun to play (especially if it seems to make sense 80-90% of the time), but it really sucks to have to depend on it for actually important stuff.
Depends what you mean by “smart assistant”. Spew a bunch of trivia on a random subject? Sure. Understand your speech commands better? Maybe. Actually manage your stuff (meetings, reminders)? Nope.
Sad, with the emergence of GPT they should’ve find a way to combine it with GPT to actually have a smart assistant.
Depends what you mean by “smart assistant”. Spew a bunch of trivia on a random subject? Sure. Understand your speech commands better? Maybe. Actually manage your stuff (meetings, reminders)? Nope.
ChatGPT is good at making up pieces of text that come very very close to what you wanted (more so in the spirit rather than the letter of it), but it’s not very good at anything else.
ChatGPT has potential to create meeting invitations. I asked it:
It answered:
BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//ChatGPT//EN CALSCALE:GREGORIAN BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Coffee Meeting at Starbucks Shibuya LOCATION:Starbucks Shibuya, Tokyo DTSTART:20230809T120000 DTEND:20230809T130000 DESCRIPTION:Let's meet up for a coffee and chat at Starbucks in Shibuya during lunchtime. END:VEVENT END:VCALENDARRequires a bit of prompt engineering to make it work, but this can probably be improved with some fine tuning. All you need is something that detects and parses ics invitation in the output.
Sure it can output .ics but the question is, would you trust it to manage your calendar? To get every single meeting right?
Software at its core is a precision tool. When it goes wrong it was either made wrong or you used it wrong. But ML introduces another layer for which the software maker doesn’t want to take responsability, and you the user have no idea if you’re using it right. When it fails there’s “nobody to blame” yet you’re the one left holding the bag.
With fundamentally flawed software like this (ambiguous by design) it’s fun to play (especially if it seems to make sense 80-90% of the time), but it really sucks to have to depend on it for actually important stuff.
If I can double check the output before I hit send, sure.
Give you a big juicy fart? Definitely
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/4yEVo9UQ168
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
deleted by creator
Ms already pushing copilot in office and windows. I think, using an old branding with questionable reputation (Cortana) would be a bad move for them.
They simply start from scratch using all “new MS” branding and wording.
isn’t the article about Cortana being replaced by a gpt powered one?
Hahaha no. No one wants that. But it’s coming I’m sure
There are a lot of people who would be excited for something like this.
It’s just that, people who focus more on privacy tend to avoid such products, and even whole companies like microshaft.