New technology brings new risks. Sell stuff via the internet? Are you crazy?
I assume they simply expect that the risks can be addressed.l. and generally I tend to agree with them. We somehow managed the fact that Google search results are not 100% accurate or Wikipedia articles can be hijacked.
I have a different impression about new AI features backporting plans, but we will see. My point is that ai targeting HW can potentially drive the next smartphones evolution, which is slowed down currently.
The same things people say about every new technology: computers, internet, smartphones etc. I use my smartphone very differently compared to 10 years ago. And apps which existed 10 years ago are very different now and require different HW. CPU progress is slowing, but AI focused hw could be the next wave.
It looks like hardware improvement is shifting to AI capabilities. If so, in 7 years pixel 8 will be hardly interesting for anyone from the target audience.
You made a statement that yandex is not Russian company any more and partially belongs to Ukraine. This is bullshit. Read Wikipedia article about yandex, it’s “золотая акция” (golde stock) and who owns this “stock” noe, read about its official status of critical company for Russia. Then go to russian IT communities and read how yandex became more and more “controlled” by the government.
Very easy start and algorithmic feed, I think.
Before that, please provide sources that ysndey partially belongs to Ukraine and is not “russian anymore”.
This pretends to be a source code which was leaked earlier, not what they open sourced.
You are completely wrong.
The gap between free and paid accounts becomes bigger and bigger.
At least for free accounts you either have history chat and allow use of your data for training or reject both. Probably same with this new type of data.
So is this another zwave or zigbee alternative?
Kind of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_(network_protocol)
I do not think so.
I use liftoff and in it the “about community” page is very fast reachable. So, your statement about mobile apps looks like ocer-generalization.
Regarding your questing, I assume that this is because the community is about all opensource software, not nessesarly free.
If it is a good and new enough Nas, synology photos can do people and object recognition. Mine can only recognize people :(
some are, some are not, but they happen.
my point was, there are some cases where human drivers act better (yet), but there are a lot of other cases where they act worse (for many different reasons). And if a single indirectly lethal case means that “Those damn things are not ready to be used on public roads.”, then human drivers are not ready either - they are responsible for much more lethal cases (per whatever unit you count).
This sounds really good. Thank you for sharing!
Sounds good, can you share an example. In Germany, this is called “Rettungsgasse” and works (mostly always) like here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kPT7VHVTb8
I think that taxi for AV is selected not because this is the most painful area which must be improved (in that case I agree apple to apple comparison would be needed), but because it is a small well controlled area which is relatively easy to start and implement an improvement feedback loop.
The thing is more complicated than than. Moreover, there is a wish/needs to train/fine-tune models locally. This is not comparable to initial training of chatGPT like models, but still require some power. Juts today I read that some pixel 8 video improvement features will not be ported to pixel 7 because they need tensor 3 power.