• uranibaba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wish I could use Linux at work but the software used does not have any alternative (that I can use) and I can’t be bothered with debloating and all that jazz. I try to keep work and private seperate instead.

    • C126@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      My work has a process for requesting software. Over the last five years, I’ve been slowly getting open source alterntives approved, using them, and telling coworkers they’re approved. It’s just one super specialized software left.

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nice!

        I work at a very small company, so there is no policy for which software to use and I would replace the one software that is Windows only if I could, even if I had to remain on Windows. The problem I have in this case is that we rely external tools that only work with this software, only on Windows. :-(

    • maxprime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Teams.

      I fucking hate teams.

      Why are we using teams.

      Why did they change outlook, it used to actually be good.

      • Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        There used to be a linux repo for installing teams but they recently removed it. Now you’re forced to use the shitty excuse of a PWA.

        • maxprime@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Either way I’m stuck on W11 at work. No way am I installing teams on my machine at home.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          The browser-based versions of the M365 apps work great* for me in Firefox tabs on Linux. I prefer them being just apps/sites that I use as needed and not deeply integrated with the OS just because the same company made the two.

          • I mean they work as intended for the same stuff I’ve used the Windows versions for, not that they are great apps on their own, lol
          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Teams doesn’t work well for me on Linux w/Firefox (it doesn’t detect my headset properly) but it works great in Edge.

      • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Teams can go fuck itself with a rock. We’ve taken licensing now that doesn’t include it.

        Still holding on to classic outlook as long as possible. The new version/skin/glow-up can go share the aforementioned rock with teams. Where’s my VBA, where’s my ribbon customisations, and why must it be dumbed down to Fisher-Price levels of ‘user friendliness’?

        A lot of my answers to user questions these days are ‘Because Microsoft ™️’.

        • maxprime@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You used to be able to paste any number of emails into a group in outlook. Now you have to add one email at a time.

          Got 100 email addresses to add to a group? Fuck you.

          No “upgrade” has impeded my productivity as much as W11 and the new office.

    • Emi@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tried get my dad to use Linux for his work but had problems with his clients not being able to open the files he sent using the Linux word and Excell programs. So that’s clear for him not to use Linux.

        • Ziglin (they/them)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because of the requirements like TPM2 and a bunch of of others.

          Most places I know need to replace all their devices to support Windows 11. For the workload they are expected to run that hardware was fine.

              • uranibaba@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Because you talked about my computer not supporting Windows 11?? So I clarified that it does support it and came pre-installed, and I would still prefer pop_OS (i.e. not relevant, as you said).

                I can’t believe your computers support Windows 11.

                I don’t understand why that would have to do with anything to being with, though.

    • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      To me the funniest part is that telemetry is usually for ads to convince people to buy stuff, and secondly for nation states to track you, but the debloat crowd usually never leaves home (a registered address) or buys anything, and surprisingly apt at credit card points with the money they do spend (the og trackers).

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I get your point. I would asume that those who chose to remove adware and remove telemetry would also be the same group that use ad blockers.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    If it takes you hours to debloat Windows, you better stick with an OS you do know.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Every time I see a Linux user’s criticism of a problem with Windows, it’s the kind of thing your grandma asks you to fix for her and takes ten seconds 😂

      Calling Windows unstable in this day and age is fucking laughable too. If your installation is unstable, it’s either you or your hardware

      • szczuroarturo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeach windows has problems but stability is definietly not one of them. Likewise linux has problems but in fact it is not harder to use ( in fact it is so easy to use that it is reasonably popular to put some easy distro in some forsaken by time laptop instead of windows for pepole who use browser and literaly nothing else ). Frankly speaking most pepole just dont give enough f about their system. The best i can say about it is that pop os specificaly just looks better ( i am in the apparent minority of pepole that very much likes the looks of gnome ). The best way to populrize linux is to have it by deafult instead of windows on laptops and prebuilds but that will never really happen ( they make insane amount of money on Markup by having windows installed despite the fact that they get it for really really cheap. Its really apparent when you compare some laptops that can be bought without the os preinstalled )

        • Grian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          It isnt that hard, moved from wondows 10 to mint, and a few months later to arch, and it took me less than 2 hours to install arch, and thats with slow internet.

          And i learned a lot whole doing it, like Dekstop environments, disk partitoning(root, swap, and boot), filesystems, and a lot more.

          I wouldnt recommend it to everyone, but it is great if you want to learn more about computers.

        • Ooops@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The wiki is actually good for beginners, too. As you are often forced to reallylly read through subpages and cross-referenced topics until you somewhat understand why you are doing something instead of just how. Doesn’t make it easy ofc but a beginner can totally handle the wiki, it just takes more time.

          • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah, this has more or less sold me on giving arch a shot in the near future. I really need to get some fundamental Linux knowledge under my belt, and the arch wiki is legendary for being pretty comprehensive.

            • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              I may get stabbed for this but, go for Endeavour, unless a (probably needlessly) tedious install process is important to you.

              I had vanilla Arch up and running for a bit but kept having issues with Steam, so switched to Endeavour and haven’t had any issues since. Its still a pretty basic version of Arch, with a few minor QoL improvements like having yay and a DE already installed.

  • Juice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Beginner friendly??? Not sure how to explain this to Linux users that post on Lemmy but we’re not the regular pc user and have a very different view on beginner friendly lol

    • cook_pass_babtridge@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      I tried explaining to some of my non-technical friends what a “Linux distribution” is. Most don’t quite understand what I mean by “operating system”. I think we’re in a bit of a bubble here.

      • Juice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Heck yeah. I usually have to explain what an OS is in the first place too. I usually use android versus iOS as an example. I feel kinda fortunate sometimes that my wife’s hobbies don’t line up with my own most of the time because it does keep my brain in check from falling into those bubbles. She appreciates having free tech support on hand of course lol

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You need to KISS your explanation. Don’t talk about OS’s or even distros. Avoid the technical stuff, save that for later as they ask about it. Instead just tell them it looks different, but in the end works the same. And it does it without the hassle, bloat or cost of Microsoft.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, one of the biggest reasons people won’t try Linux isn’t necessarily because it is difficult, but because it would require learning anything at all. Never underestimate how much effort a person is willing to make to avoid making an effort.

    • Shadow Glider@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I recently swapped to Linux Mint and it really was not harder than Windows, and I know functionally nothing on how anything Linux related actually works.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        And there is little to nothing to fear. The big bad terminal and command line isn’t needed for day to day use anymore. It’s been years since the last time I needed to compile anything. And if I ever do need to do that again, something is definitely wrong.

          • bluewing@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            For daily use, you don’t need the command line. Only in fairly rare instances do you need to resort to it when things go wrong. And those commands are a mere google away. So don’t let the that big bad scary terminal stand in your way. It’s not the stumbling block you think it is.

            • lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Oh, I live in the terminal, even on Windows. I like having that capability. Not everybody does though.

              • bluewing@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Then it’s a habit not a fear. I also am comfortable with the cli since I started with Linux back at RedHat 5 and Mandrake 6. It was learn it or die in those days. But as time has passed, I find myself using it less and less because I don’t really need it everyday. But while I might need to google a specific command because I forgot it, I still remember it’s possible and handy.

      • Juice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh I’m not saying that it’s hard for us here. Most people don’t know that Mac and Windows are different if they aren’t in a tech position let alone know that Linux exists at all. I’m talking about the general person on the street, it’s hard to remember that we don’t always fit into that group.

    • AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This entire thread talking about how a distro is better than the next because you “only” have to update keyrings to update so even basic users should get it.