Sometimes when I use exact matches like "keyword1" "keyword2" I see results that contain some of the matches but not others. Is there a search engine that only shows results with all the exact matches exactly as they are written?

    • _cnt0@lemmy.villa-straylight.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember this working really well on google. Recently (several months?) it didn’t as I would expect. Fictional example: when searching for “asdf123” google would show results just containing ‘asdf’. One particular thing I noticed was that google seems to omit underscores from verbatim strings. So for example when searching for “asdf_qwertz” it would show results that contained asdf and qwertz without the underscore.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s just not true. Search for “SearchX222”, you get zero results. Even though both SearchX and SearchX2 exist.

        Google has been decent as a search, the problem nowadays are bait sites with fake articles and thousands of keywords on them to trick the system. The results suck, but it’s not Google’s fault.

        • Kerfuffle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know about your or the other person’s particular examples but even when quoting stuff, Google search very frequently thinks it knows better than the user. I use quoting a lot and very often it gives me something I didn’t ask for with “I think you meant blah: showing results for blah” even though I specifically quoted my query to ask for something other than “blah”.

          It was a lot more reliable about giving me what I actually asked for a few years ago. The results are currently a lot worse when you’re searching for something specific.

          • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If it’s a common typo it does that, but below it is a link “search instead for” with your original word.

            It never forces other results when you use the word in quotation marks (it might just tell you “Did you mean xy?” without showing results for that).

            • Kerfuffle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              If it’s a common typo it does that, but below it is a link “search instead for” with your original word.

              Pretty sure it’s not just common typos. However you’re right that it doesn’t provide a link to search with the original word. It’s just annoying that even I explicitly went through the trouble of quoting my query it still tries to second guess me and makes me follow another link to get to the results I originally requested.

              • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Most users are idiots, so the behavior makes sense.

                If some random teenager googles: “Am I preganante?” then the search result should guess “pregnant” instead and those kind of users will be happy.

                It only gets annoying when you search for highly specific things, but I’ve found if you put it in quotation marks it usually works out.

                My biggest issue isn’t the search, but the dozens of generated spam sites that nowadays crowd the first search result page :-/

                • Kerfuffle@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Makes sense, sure. If you aren’t in the category of idiot though it’s pretty annoying and it’s just plain harder to get the results you’re looking for than it used to be.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hasn’t properly for several years, in my experience. If there aren’t enough results for it, it will just generalise the search, sometimes without telling you that there were none matching those specific terms. It used to.