• pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    We need more housing in general too, to be honest, and to stop people buying it and directly distribute the housing to families looking for a primary residence.

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Tax the shit out of the businesses that are holding onto these houses. Extra penalties for letting them sit empty. Special tax for companies with more than x% of purchasable inventory within certain regions. A lot of this could be fixed by taking money away from the people hoarding it.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        We need to tax holding property as an investment if you aren’t living there or using it for your business. I’m not sure if it’s already taxed as capital gains or not, but it sure as hell should be. There’s nothing wrong with property being an investment – you should think of your house as an investment – but there’s a significant problem in treating property like stocks.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The best way to reduce the viability of housing as an investment is to just build more housing.

          And no, you ideally should never think of your house as an investment, because that means housing prices are rising.

      • Pipoca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s fairly few units that people are just letting sit unused and empty.

        In 2022, 23% of vacant for-rent units were vacant for less than a month. Only 26% were vacant for more than 6 months.

        There’s more vacant housing “held off market”, but keep in mind that includes housing occupied by people with usual residences elsewhere, housing that’s currently held up in legal proceedings, housing currently under construction or repair, or in need of repair. The amount that’s being held off market by Blackrock to keep prices high is tiny at best.

        Vacancy taxes have been tried, and their effect is generally fairly small. That’s not to say that they’re bad, just that they’re only a small part of a larger solution.