![](/static/f79995a8/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/4271bdc6-5114-4749-a5a9-afbc82a99c78.png)
Reminds me of when a friend of mine took a shot of Malort. We had nothing nearby for her to chase it with, so she used the Tabasco sauce on the table. And then realized she had made an awful choice, and dashed off to get some water.
Reminds me of when a friend of mine took a shot of Malort. We had nothing nearby for her to chase it with, so she used the Tabasco sauce on the table. And then realized she had made an awful choice, and dashed off to get some water.
You just gave me a fear I didn’t know I had.
To add, I have seen informative discords before, but it requires a dedicated mod team to organize the channels into read only, informative posts.
Definitely works 1000x better as a community chat though.
At the very least, every AI should be able to spit out a comprehensive list of all the material it used for training. And it should be capable of removing any specific item and regenerating its algorithm.
This is a fundamental requirement of the technology itself to function. What happens if one the training materials has a retraction? Or if the authors admit they used AI to generate it? You need to purge that knowledge to keep the AI healthy and accurate.
Well said.
Charge AI recurring tuition then.
Simple – you can’t charge for AI generation
still need someone knowledgeable in the loop to describe the things it needs to do, and handle exceptions
And any engineer or technician will tell you, exceptions are 80% of their job.
It’s like a car crash you can’t look away from
We can. You can blame the “Greens” for it not happening.
Til, thanks!
I’m not so sure. A lot of environmental laws require companies to self report exceeding limits, and they actually do. It was a common thing for my contact engineer colleagues to be called up at night to calculate release amounts because their unit had an upset.
A law like this would force companies to at least pretend to comply. None can really say “we’re not going to because you can’t catch us”.
It blows my mind honestly. This is such a young technology that commercialization at this point seems ridiculous
How about we build the reactors that can consume the extremely toxic waste so that we can get rid of it?
That requires someone in business to think
I’m not convinced that Altman has cleared this beyond meaningless buzzwords
That’s favorable isn’t it? Starting and stopping at low speeds would drain power faster I think?
You know. Fair enough!
TLDR how do?
Hey now, that’s they’re prerogative – just like it’s my prerogative to never give them a cent of money again.
This is almost always the case. If it’s biodegradable at room temperature and pressure, it’ll be degrading once you get it.
We’re probably best off converting most of our things into industrially biodegradable products, and then having our waste go to composting plants instead of landfills.