archive.is link

Earlier this year, WIRED asked AI detection startup Pangram Labs to analyze Medium. It took a sampling of 274,466 recent posts over a six week period and estimated that over 47 percent were likely AI-generated. “This is a couple orders of magnitude more than what I see on the rest of the internet,” says Pangram CEO Max Spero. (The company’s analysis of one day of global news sites this summer found 7 percent as likely AI-generated.)

  • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The best part about this, is that new models will be trained on the garbage from old models and eventually LLMs will just collapse into garbage factories. We’ll need filter mechanisms, just like in a Neal Stephenson book.

  • haroldstork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Omg the amount of times I’ve clicked on a Medium article in the last month and immediately knew it was AI is so frustrating!!! They aren’t even helpful articles because you can tell there is no real understanding.

  • derbis@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    13 hours ago

    How well does the “AI detection startup’s” product work? This is a big unsolved problem but I’d be hecka skeptical.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s not so much that it’s AI generated … it’s also AI influenced.

    I know so many professional office workers who once wrote some of the most boring sometimes stupid emails because they didn’t know how to write or get their message across or constantly miscommunicated things because they worded things wrong … now all of a sudden they’ve become professional writers and all their emails look like auto generated messages.

    I’m guessing that many writers also take the AI shortcut. They get a bunch of content generated from an AI than just rewrite it for themselves. Some content i see is lazily edited and some is heavily. But I get the feeling that just about everyone is using it because it’s an easy way to get a bunch of work done without having to think too much.

    • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The implication that rewriting GPT output makes one a professional writer … not sure we’re on the same page there. If you know how to use it for those results, great!

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      At work? Yeah I’m gonna use AI to write that email. I didn’t think or do anything more than the minimum required before, I’m not starting now. AI just makes it so that the same garbage I would sent before, now smells nice.

      If you like writing as an art. Why would you have the machine do that for you? If you like thinking, you can do the thinking and let the machine do that for you.

      All of these are different uses.

    • RickRussell_CA@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Perhaps, but I don’t read anything on Substack unless I’m subscribed. Reputation is the entire point on Substack, without it, the content will get no traffic.