• freewheel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Couple of things here - what do you do with the open source models already published? There’s terabytes of data encapsulated in those. Some have published corpora, some don’t. How do you plan to determine that a work comes from an unregistered AI?

    Also, with respect to “within the country” - VPNs exist. TOR exists. SD cards exist. What’s your plan to control the flow of trained models without violating civil rights?

    This is a teflon slope covered in oil. (IMO)

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they don’t publish what their training data is, they should be considered violating copyright. The world governments can block sites if they want. It’s hard to swat down all of the random wikis and such but major AI competitors wouldn’t be a big problem.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Innocent until proven guilty” is a rather important foundation for most justice systems. You’re proposing the exact opposite.