WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoDo you consider AI art “OC” ?message-squaremessage-square154fedilinkarrow-up193arrow-down19
arrow-up184arrow-down1message-squareDo you consider AI art “OC” ?WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square154fedilink
minus-squareMelllvar@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoBecause humans can have new ideas.
minus-squareredballooon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoHow new is a new idea, if it must be formulated in an existing language?
minus-squareMelllvar@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoLanguage is itself invented by humans.
minus-squareredballooon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoNot by me though, or you. Can’t have new ideas 😞
minus-squareMelllvar@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year ago“Humans can have new ideas” isn’t “humans only have new ideas”.
minus-squareatan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThose ‘new’ ideas can be inputted as a prompt into an AI image generator. Would the output of that satisfy your criteria for OC?
Because humans can have new ideas.
How new is a new idea, if it must be formulated in an existing language?
Language is itself invented by humans.
Not by me though, or you. Can’t have new ideas 😞
“Humans can have new ideas” isn’t “humans only have new ideas”.
Those ‘new’ ideas can be inputted as a prompt into an AI image generator. Would the output of that satisfy your criteria for OC?