• DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    True. This exposes American foreign policy as hypocritical as it usually is. What is also sad is the fact that US citizens can do little about it as long as nothing fundamentally changes. In the next presidential election, they only have the choice between an obviously criminal fascist and a halfway normal-thinking politician who does not shy away from supporting crimes against humanity. How one can still speak of a functioning democracy in this situation is beyond me. It’s just a choice between plague and cholera.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’re not wrong about most of what you said but I am wondering why you seemed to equate those two choices in President. From the way you described them one seems pretty drastically worse than the other to me.

      • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Your are still trying to shove shit in our mouths and convince us it is a great choice since it comes with a little mustard to cut the taste

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m not a fan of Joe Biden at all but I’m also not taking issue with my description of him compared to Trump. OP is the one who described him as a normal politician. The only person shoving shit in your mouth is you.

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You have to decide for yourselves. All I am saying is that choosing between two evils does not correspond to my understanding of a democracy in which politics pursues the interests of the people. Of course, you always have to make concessions, but for me both candidates would be unelectable if there were alternatives, namely a third or even a fourth option. But your system doesn’t provide for that. That’s why I think you should consider whether this system makes sense - but you’ll have to answer this question yourselves, I’m afraid.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The system doesn’t make sense. Everyone knows that. But it’s the system we have. So you either have to engage with the system to change the system. As we have historically done. Or find a way to overthrow the system to replace it with something better. something that has only ever been attempted by racists and in more recent times, twice by Republican fascists. Though not many share their limited idea of better.

          You want better choices? Don’t just vote every 4 years in the general. Vote every year in every primary and general. Don’t just vote. Campaign for someone. Don’t just campaign for someone. Run yourself.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Someone has never heard of the French Revolution or the October revolution.

            Apparently only right wingers get to work outside of the system. If you’re a good person you work within the system. /s

            Peak liberal right here. “The status quo is what we have, no matter how horrible. What are you, some kind of right winger?”

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Genocide is genocide.

        Harm reduction arguments only work to a point. If genocide is still the outcome, then it isn’t really harm reduction.