• NumbersCanBeFun@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think it only qualifies as “milk” based on its color. I don’t think it’s actually milk but I don’t know enough to commit to that answer.

        • xX_fnord_Xx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Adapted I think is a better term than evolved. Most people would be lactose intolerant if they stopped drinking milk after being weened off of breast milk.

          • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Eh I feel like that is semantics. If we are specific and refer to how individuals adapt to be lactose tolerant, you could still say “humans evolved to drink milk” instead in reference to how the population of humans that could adapt and become lactose tolerant grew in relation to humans that couldn’t.

      • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t appeal to evolution, evolution is weird. Evolution just does whatever survival says. If we can survive drinking milk, evolution is cool with it. But evolution is weird, evolution will be all like “You like cows milk huh? That’s cool, have you considered shrinking down and losing your brain and most internal organs to become a nipple latching milk parasyte? No? Ok, I’ll ask again later.”