• Here4CatPics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Dear God, Cthulhu, Flying Spaghetti Monster, Shiva, Tiny Baby Jesus in His crib

    All I ask for the next 2 years is universal healthcare, Henry Kissinger to die an embarrassing death, and this to be true

    • tym@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like your wishlist! The fact nobody mentions that the devil still lives among us is sad. I hope he gets accidentally castrated by a dull knife in times square during the live NYE broadcast.

  • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Even worse fate for cryptobros than Bitcoin deleting itself: people actually realizing that digital hashes don’t have real value.

    Mind you this applies to regular money too.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Real money is backed by a country’s respective economy - its an IOU from the government

      Bitcoin is an IOU backed by nothing

      That’s pretty rudimentary but it explains it

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So basically, the more people who believe in the value of some thing, the more that thing holds actual value?

        There’s literally no difference. We could be trading with sea shells if we found utility in it.

        • wewbull@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes. A diamond is just a rock somebody found. Same for gold. They have value because they are scarce and people think they are pretty (up until the last couple of centuries when we developed industrial uses for both). Nobody has ever needed a diamond or a hunk of gold to survive, yet they have value because we say that they are valuable.

        • weirdwallace75@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          So basically, the more people who believe in the value of some thing, the more that thing holds actual value?

          Yes. That’s how value works.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_value

          The paradox of value (also known as the diamond–water paradox) is the contradiction that, although water is on the whole more useful, in terms of survival, than diamonds, diamonds command a higher price in the market.

          • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            water is on the whole more useful, in terms of survival, than diamonds, diamonds command a higher price in the market

            Water doesn’t command a higher price in the market than diamonds so far!

        • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup. One of the original tokens people used as money was kaori shells. They held value because they were considered pretty decorations, were limited in the number that entered society and were easy to serve as a intermediary trade good. All you need for a currency is for people to treat it as a currency. The other bit that usually ends up being a factor is scarcity. You can either create scarcity artificially for things like coins or bills where you make replicating them a crime or you choose a natural resource where new stuff coming in does slowly enough it doesn’t destabilize the system. If ever there is a sudden glut of new currency stuff entering the system the currency gets devalued because you are tying it to stuff you need to survive like food, shelter and tools which are finite and have actual concrete value.

          Gold for instance historically was not particularly super useful but it doesn’t corrode, can be infinitely reused, enters the system at a trickle and is nice and shiny so people like it. It is functionally just like trading seashells.

        • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, one thing is taxes, which are payable in the local government’s fiat currency, which ensures that there’s always demand for the fiat currency, assuming a responsible monetary policy.

        • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is a difference. For instance let’s say UK rejoins EU and has to adopt the Euro. The pound gets depreciated as people switch currencies. It’s the responsibility of the government to make sure people can exchanges their pounds for euros at a fair rate.

          You can’t do that with crypto currencies because there’s no authoritative body who will be willing to take the worthless currency and exchange it for another currency without any initial value being lost.

          There are plenty more example where the lack of an authoritative body (which is what people consider the benefit of crypto) is actually not good for the user.

          • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re saying if the GBP starts to lose value the UK government will start exchanging the now-worthless currency for another more valuable currency like USD or EUR to keep its value up? Where do you think the UK government will get all this foreign currency? Wouldn’t they run out of money and go bankrupt at some point?

            • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No. I said that if the country is going to switch currency, from example pound to euro, then the government will facilitate that switch even though the pound is going to become worthless. But you are kinda hitting the nail on the head. The government will make sure they have Euros to exchange to and they will “take a loss” when people bring their pounds for exchange (I won’t get much into the will they go bankrupt question because the US has 32? trillion in debt and the US hasn’t gone bankrupt so I’m not sure if countries even can go bankrupt).

              Now apply those two question to crypto and answer them. Let’s say one day people want to switch from bitcoin to something more viable (which is a very realistic thing to happen because the underlying tech can depreciate) who is going to facilitate that currency exchange? Who is going to stock up on this new currency and who is going to buy the now worthless currency?

                • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Neither do I but nothing about your comment comes even close to my point was making. The bankruptcy aspect is just a minor detail that can be easily dismissed by common sense, no government is going to change currency if it bankrupts them. If it does then it’s just bad governance.

                  That’s all I’m going to say on that topic.

      • weirdwallace75@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Real money is backed by a country’s respective economy

        True.

        its an IOU from the government

        False.

        An IOU from the government is a bond.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I understand that’s a bond

          The dollar is representative of the work you contributed to the economy

          • weirdwallace75@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The dollar is representative of the work you contributed to the economy

            If that’s true, nobody on Social Security Disability would be getting money.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mind you this applies to regular money too.

      No, you can use regular money to pay taxes and demand that it be accepted for all debts private and public. The same isn’t true of Bitcoin

      • NPC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh you can definitely demand people take your bitcoin. You’ll just look like a huge twat while doing so and people will rightfully laugh at you ;)

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is such a dumb argument cause it literally takes seconds to convert BTC to fiat. You can buy whatever you want with bitcoin.

  • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    All cryptocurrency isn’t stiricrly based off of magic and mysterious bitcoin code.

    Even if there was code that made the coin erase itself, it would have been found and fixed (or abandoned for a new and better blockchain coin a’la Ethereum or Monero).

  • some pirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well there is a limit of mining, every new digit is 16 times harder to make, there are just 2 or 3 digits left.

    This was made with growth and inflation in mind so the currency last like 60-80 years but they didn’t predict giant farms using entire powerplants of energy, so basically 50 years of bitcoin was shortened to the last 5. The thing is profitability as miners have to make an entire 28 bit hash at random wasting dozens of GPU in exchange of less money of what they cost so the prizes must be risen even more making it even more centralized (also lowering the price for every other holder)

    This is almost poetic As bitcoin approaches its end only the top miners are allowed to continue increasing the risk of the death which is 51% attack, if some of the final miners will unite and reach 51% at this point they can cash out the entire currency and make it look that the price falls to zero.

    • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. I fail to see how it could even be true on a conceptual level.

      If it were true, what would happen on that day, or probably a few days prior, is that there would be many new Bitcoin forks that use the same transaction history (and thus the same balances) as Bitcoin. After possibly a short scramble and chaos, one or potentially multiple of those forks would then be seen as the Bitcoin while the rest fade to obscurity.

      Cryptocurrencies, especially big ones, fork all the time. All it takes is an individual who wants to make a fork. Yes, that means if you have any currency on that chain before the fork, you’ll have that same amount on both currencies after the fork. In the rare case where both blockchains after the fork hold any value/respect though, this gets EXTREMELY funny if someone had an NFT on that chain before the fork. Now they have two NFTs (one on each side of the split) and could sell them to separate people, or keep one and sell one, etc.

      For clarity: when I wrote “fork” above I was talking about “hard forks” specifically.

    • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bitcoin is still Bitcoin. Bitcoin classic, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin SV, Bitcoin gold… All are just garbage scams forking off Bitcoin