psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThe New York Times tried to block the Internet Archive: another reason to value the latterwalledculture.orgexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1567arrow-down18cross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up1559arrow-down1external-linkThe New York Times tried to block the Internet Archive: another reason to value the latterwalledculture.orgpsychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square23fedilinkcross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoYou made a statement with an undefined term “x.” I defined “x” for you. Substitute 0 for x in your statement, and think about it for a bit.
minus-squarephillaholic@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI understand the math, thanks. I’m talking about what you meant by accountability.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThe publication needs to be held accountable for its unethical edits, which seems to only be possible thanks to a resource like this archive.
minus-squarephillaholic@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoOk, you’re talking about something entirely different. There could be a way to show edits without giving away the entire content of the article for free. That’s valid.
I don’t follow
You made a statement with an undefined term “x.” I defined “x” for you. Substitute 0 for x in your statement, and think about it for a bit.
I understand the math, thanks. I’m talking about what you meant by accountability.
The publication needs to be held accountable for its unethical edits, which seems to only be possible thanks to a resource like this archive.
Ok, you’re talking about something entirely different. There could be a way to show edits without giving away the entire content of the article for free. That’s valid.