You’re right, it’s not “just” Proton. I also tried recently GoG for Pod and… it just worked! From buying the (sigh) Windows game to playing on Linux in literally minutes. Amazing.

For WMR I don’t know unfortunately. Monado does work though and I would check https://lvra.gitlab.io as it’s a great starting point, maybe starting with the Monado SteamVR plugin.

to steam deck.

to SteamOS

So… FWIW I post often about I have a painless NVIDIA experience, including playing Windows only games, including VR games.

I thought “Damn… how did I get so lucky?” and yesterday while tinkering with partitions (as one does…) I decided I’d try a “speed run” to go from no system to a VR Windows only game running on Linux.

I started from Debian 12 600Mb ISO and ~1h later I was playing.

I’m not saying everybody should have a perfect experience playing games on Linux with an NVIDIA but … mine was again pretty straightforward.

I’d argue it’s easier with Ubuntu and accepting non-free repository, probably having the same result, ~1hr from 0 to play, without even using the command line once.

FWIW you can fix it locally and eventually use a pull request.

I don’t know find well enough to comment on feasibility but I bet it’d be interesting to try, and maybe realize it’s not trivial.

My bad I didn’t see that proportion thanks for clarifying. As more than half are already going over the speed limit then there is indeed a more systemic problem. I thought it was about say 10% fringe that go with heavily modified bikes. I’m not sure more tech would help though, rather than fines with explanation of the risk until people do start respecting the limit. If people are unable to respect that and it causes more accidents, then yes ISA on e-bikes, cars, everything causing accident on the road.

They can, cf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_speed_assistance with example in this thread

Apparently starting ISA in July 2024 https://www.brusselstimes.com/855280/self-braking-cars-all-new-cars-to-be-fitted-with-speed-limiting-technology

at least easier to find those who do it and fine them.

Missed that part, can you please clarify how?

I can’t see why this is not a good idea

I believe the argument here is that it’s security theater, i.e it looks positive but in practice has literally no effect. To clarify if people buy a “normal” e-bike today, they are already speed limited. Consequently people who have bike going faster that said limit are doing something already beyond the ordinary. The likelihood that such people would suddenly change their behavior to buy typical bikes when they have even more restrictions is probably not high, but the announcement still makes it look like something is done for the greater good.

Damn, finally. Can’t wait to see this actually take place. Only ambulances, firefighter or such services that genuinely need the speed and can justify it should be able to go fast in a city. On a highway where everybody are in properly protected vehicle all going in the same direction, sure, go fast, but a city where people actually live, kids walk to school, people walk their dogs, why going over the speed limit where you could literally kill someone.

July 2024 is very close but I wonder what will be the percentage of cars on the roads supporting ISA. I imagine less than 1% so curious about the rate of change. I imagine that due to LEZ though it could go relatively fast. There is hope after all for a city genuinely made for people.

It’s called having standards.

OK provocation aside yes, you actually have to stand for what you believe in. For some people it means not going to a meat restaurants, for others, like me, it means no accepted a WhatsApp chat or a Google Drive share. You also do that but because it’s either so ingrained or accepted you do not even notice anymore. You standards might not be mine but if neither of us do push back, then we as a society go backward IMHO. So… yes it means my circle of acquaintances is not the most inclusive but I do accept boundaries and if it means someone is toxic according to my perspective, they are out, simple.

Easy, I don’t talk to such people. They can have my email or phone number if truly necessary. Yes, same for family or work, just not using Meta products for communication. Surprisingly enough people do understand.

I don’t think so, here is another example, what if the device counts how many times someone said “fuck”, then sending {fuck:0} or {fuck:4,294,967,295} will result in the same size of data being transmitted. In fact imagining that the device is designed to do so, it could always send a large meaningless packet on querying for updates just so that when it actually needs to send data, it would look similar, same approximate number and lengths of packets and can be capped. I’m not saying it’s the case now, just technically feasible and I believe hard to detect.

Also on “trusting” someone then answered in https://lemmy.world/comment/4594899 but I’d said it’s also not “easy”. At least one must trust their institutions able to vet on the person able to review such devices and that the device tested and the one used are actually identical.

Finally I’m not arguing for conspiracy theory or that Echo is spying on users, only that verification for privacy on closed system is not “easy” either through trust of 3rd parties or technical expertise for an “average” user, not somebody working in the domain.

Well that’s arguably “easy” but then one must trust these people and thus either know them and their motives or understand the underlying technology (and thus not needing their expertise) so I’d say no really “easy”.

Are you saying the size of the upstream packet should be proportional to the mute time? Wouldn’t that assume that one knows ahead what such logs include or not? For example if we imagine that the device is listening while on mute for the keyword “potato” and it’s not being said once during the mute period, wouldn’t that still making an upstream packet of a fixed length, i.e zero, despite being actively listening and able to phone home? Genuinely trying to understand how one can be so confident based solely on packet size as this seems to make some assumption on how the device behaves.

Edit: regardless, monitoring traffic (which I already mentioned, hence aware of but arguing it’s not sufficient) using Wireshark or netcat is definitely not “easy” for most people buying such devices.

Curious to learn how would you verify it. Wouldn’t one has to go as low level as power spikes? Not to sound paranoid but one can’t just believe the PR these companies said. Consequently we have to check how the device behaves. It’s not because it doesn’t send information that it does not process it. One could imagine it logs on specific behavior or keywords and only send information back when “normal” behavior is expected, e.g update check. I’m not trying to imply this is the case, only that verifying doesn’t seem “easy” to me.

Convenience is one of the most addictive drugs.

Or you stay in your bubble, not seeing any algorithmic suggestion but only discussing with people you trust. Not saying it’s better but definitely one possible way to use it.

If only the BBC does it then sure, it’s pointless. If the BBC does it and you and I consider it, it might change things a bit. If we do and others do, including large websites, or author guilds starting legal actions in the US, then it does change things radically to the point of rendering OpenAI LLMs basically useless or practically unusable. IMHO this isn’t an action against LLMs in general, not e.g against researchers from public institutions building datasets and publishing research results, but rather against OpenAI the for-profit company that has exclusive right with the for-profit behemoth Microsoft which a champion of entrenchment.

shocked Pikachu face

Did customers really forgot the ebook 1984 event or assume they’d “just” get “better”?

Honestly kind of deserved, don’t buy from Amazon! Wondering why? Read Chokepoint capitalism but TLDR their business model is monopoly and monopsony. They’re terrible.