I desperately want to watch his 8 hour analysis of Starfield but am scared of the commitment.
I desperately want to watch his 8 hour analysis of Starfield but am scared of the commitment.
Users not reading shit I can understand but it makes my blood boil when it your own bloody colleagues.
Apologies for the late reply, still getting a hang of this!
By multiple devices issues I meant the following. Sometimes for example, I am on a Teams call on my phone but want to use my laptop to view screensharing stuff and join the call there too (without hanging up the phone). Teams will insist that my audio switch over to the laptop too and I have to manually disable the audio on the laptop and re-enable it on the phone. It shocks me that such a mature offering from a massive corporation still cannot figure out that I may want a screenshare/audio split onto two devices and ask me at least. Another smaller nag, if I want audio only on the phone, it will constantly bug me to tell me the incoming video is switched off. I kind of understand this however, I get that they want to let the average user know why there is no incoming video, but surely there ought to be a “leave me alone” setting for this.
It has indeed improved a lot over the last 2 years or so and is now actually quite a mature product, as much as I hate to admit that about an MS product. My biggest gripes with it are its refusal to acknowledge you may be using multiple devices (to this day) and MS’s insistence that a person only do one thing at one time (can’t edit calendar items while checking a chat, for example). Their Linux app is a joke and I’m better off running it from Chrome. The phone app makes the WiFi interface crash constantly and I have to run it off 4G; it is the only app I have this issue with.
Which brings me to another gripe. Teams documentation insists that screen sharing on Linux is not supported, and sure enough you cannot see the option for it while on a call with someone. However if you are in a meeting (with however many people), the option magically appears and works absolutely perfectly.
Bravo 👏🏼
People by their very definition are narrative. If one has ever taken an action that effected another, they are part of ‘the’ narrative.
Only fascist trans murderers question the given narrative.
I haven’t had Netflix for a while and was recently shocked at just how awful the quality was. (this was with decent internet + “full HD” subscription)
Sure thing. But name one that wouldn’t be nicer without the alcohol in it.
Spoiler for anon: no one is drinking it for the taste.
😄😄 No personal offence meant good sir.
This is what I’ll be telling myself as I rock and cry myself to sleep at night.
Great distinction.
This isn’t a court of law and I’m not arguing the statutes. I don’t like unilateral censorship in any form and I’d be equally butt hurt if they banned a mod to include pronouns.
Bear in mind we are both here because of the actions of a private corpo.
It’s almost like you exclude yet call it inclusion.
No I do not, no one should. Your comment is the correct way of disagreeing, downvote parades are not.
Bear in mind I don’t give a shit about pronouns or no pronouns, I am against the unilateral censorship of a mod.
Upvotes = correct now? Or I’m wrong cos I have a different opinion to you?
Braindead take
Yah, how dare someone not be a polarised momo and make me have to assess their pov without a convenient label with which to dismiss it.
Dude I thought reddit was leftist and then I came here. Funny thing is I’m a pansy lefty European (believe in social healthcare, UBI and all that good stuff) yet this place is a bit much for me.
All over the place in Europia. From train station to public parks, in multiple countries, it is somewhat common for a turnstile with a coin slot for a small charge. Doesn’t bother me if it allows for cleaner, safer facilities and keeps the riff raff out.