Well I posted this to see if there are instances that already have similar principles, without creating my own.
Well I posted this to see if there are instances that already have similar principles, without creating my own.
Exactly, I am not necessarily planning on participating in these communities, I am just trying to be open minded and see what is posted there, who knows maybe there is something interesting.
Well the removal of posts and comments cannot be avoided. What I want is just to be able to see everything on my feed, and to be able to decide the communities I want to ban instead of admins doing that for me.
Well sure running my own instance would work, but I don’t think it is necessary really, as I am sure there are people who think similar and have instances dedicated to this.
Thank you for taking your time to reply, but you misunderstood my question.
I am not looking for an instance that promotes hate speech. I am just looking for one that is not planning to defederate.
A person can share some values from both sides of political spectrum. Why is that concept so difficult for people to understand?
Its definetely not a myth
I think they would be more moderate if more moderate people would have opportunity to participate. Right now all of the non left instances or communities get too quickly defederated and deleted, so moderate people who would normally participate dont want to create na account on a completely defederated instance. The only thing you are left of there are some crazies.
The only way I heard of conservative communities here is from a post that is asking for defederation or deletion
I think you need to learn to not take some things too personal. There will always be offending stuff in the world. It’s not good for your health to take offense on everything you see.
Just ban their communities if you dont want to see their conter, its not that hard!
Sadly USA was not charged for war crimes for using it in the past.
Redirecting the blame will not solve anything, you can blame rich people for many bad things happening, but blaming them for anything that crosses your mind is making your argument weak.
I saw the children that were burning the cars last night, they are at max 16-17 yo. They need to learn that their actions have consequences, it is a part of growing up. Telling them that what they are doing is fine “because rich people exist”, they will never take responsibility for their actions, and will always find someone else to blame. There is no possible way for you to justify their actions, because violence does not justify more violence.
I strongly suggest you to stop labeling people you disagree with as fascists. It seem to me that you don’t even know what fascism is. I don’t know how old you are, you sound really young. Its really hard to take you seriously in a discussion with that attitude.
Hey man, first relax. You are accusing me of being fascist because I was against defederating. What I am standing against is what you just said, that my opinion doesn’t matter. Even though I don’t agree with you I will never say that your opinion doesn’t matter, that is my stance against defederation. I don’t agree with what they are posting on exploding heads, but I don’t think their opinion doesn’t matter.
The paper from the car burned last night, it was a father not a mother my mistake. “Merci pour un papa seul que va bien galérer avec ses 3 enfants”. Do you think this person deserved to be left without a car, while he was struggling bringing up 3 children? Did he have anything to do with the killing of Nahel? Why is he the one that is getting the consequences?
Oh shut up please. What a load of bullshit.
Getting woken up 3rd time this year, to a huge bonfire of burning cars. Targeting the rich? This is ridicoulous. A note I saw on a car that burned last night, something in the lines of “Thank you for burning my car, from a single mother with 3 children”. And you refuse to call that mindless
Supporting Biden and Clintons also makes you complicit in crimes they committed all over the world? I have nothing against that statement, but you should really keep the same standard for everyone and not be selective.
I never noticed it being banned as I never cared about it. People who noticed are people who interacted with them, either supporting it or going there to get offended. But one of the reasons leaving reddit is censorship of different opinions, I don’t want the same to happen here.
I saw plenty of leftist being intolerant, but noone thought about censoring them. Being from a country that had great casualties due to nazi invasions, I am careful to who I am calling a nazi. Leftist calling everyone they disagree with a nazi, is trivializing how horrible those people really were.
Allowing the community to exist is not the same as supporting what it stands for.
A lot of people including myself, do not really care about Donald Trump (not from USA), but just supports free speech in general.
Not being from USA, I could not really care any less about Trump.
But your take is just insane in my opinion.
To me it seems like that the hate towards Trump is purely political, and I did not really see a strong evidence of him being that wildly racist
I opened that community, I didn’t see any racist posts
There are actually moderated instances that have similar views as yours, you should look at beehaw.org. No reason for you to be exposed to the content you are sensitive to if you don’t want to. This is the beauty of lemmy in my opinion
Well you are contradicting.
People who are affected by the hate speech, can easily chose one of the many instances that are curating and censoring, and that is completely fine. The others who are not sensitive to it and want to hear what the other side is saying, should have a way to do so I think.
Well you know, the same is said by both sides, and on both sides people always find a way to justify their stance and portray the other side as the worst evil, while the reality is in between.
That’s why I am not picking sides, but instead decide on my own what I think make sense what does not, but in order to be able to do that, one needs to be exposed to both sides of the argument. You don’t need to agree on everything with particular group, but you can agree on some things