![](/static/f79995a8/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/fb5ac8b0-1917-478e-aca4-686461ad3d47.webp)
I wouldn’t be caught driving on that bridge if it was over a bone dry riverbed.
It looks like the classic rickety rope bridge trope
I wouldn’t be caught driving on that bridge if it was over a bone dry riverbed.
It looks like the classic rickety rope bridge trope
You wouldn’t download rear-heated seats.
Mastodon really runs on direct post engagement, especially boosts, to make the whole thing work without an algorithm
It’s very similar to tumblr in that a boost is supposed to function like a like/upvote to spread content, since no automated algorithm is going to suggest that post for you.
But I’m sure people are also trying to grow their networks quick, since it’s sort of a hollow experience without it
Needs a special character?
Password123!
This is how Mickey Mouse comes into creation
Salix is right that it alludes to the Dead Internet Theory.
I don’t actually subscribe to the full theory that the internet is already dead and we only talk to bots, but I do think bot activity may become advanced and pervasive enough to create a “Dead Internet” like scenario (or at least fundamentally alter platforms away from what we currently know as the internet experience)
These companies not being able to handle bot attacks without hamstringing major parts of their platforms is a canary in the coal mine for the Dead Internet.
QGIS and OpenStreetMap for mapping
Well well well. What a pointless exercise in obstinance
In a city like the one in the picture, anything remotely usable you put out will be gone by the end of the day.
The three plaintiffs allege that when prompted, ChatGPT will produce a summary of their works. They claim this is copyright infringement, as they did not consent to their books being fed to ChatGPT.
How can they have a case? How many sites, interviews, social media posts have content that goes over summaries of their books?
Silverman herself has probably gone over the book context in enough posts and press releases/interviews to give ChatGPT all the context it needs.
I’m not giving them any more spotlight or attention
Unless it’s a fight to the death, I’d probably tune in
If only paid subscribers could get more than 25 uses of GPT-4 every 3 hours…
I think the content level has gotten better even in the past few days.
I predict at ~200,000 users, there will be a good enough flow of posts and comments that it won’t feel as empty compared to Reddit.
They must have changed their paywall behavior, I just went and was able to see every image I clicked on.
The login popup appears after a few pages but you can just exit out and keep viewing. Google should be able to index the pages without access issues
Maybe that previous aggressive login screen killed their SEO before, I see much less pinterest images than I used to years ago
Is ensuring an information monopoly for an unethical, profit-above-else driven corporation making the world better?
Yes I think about Hacker News, which isn’t technically sophisticated nor does it have a massive userbase (a little less than 1 million registered accounts).
It manages to have a steady stream of content and an active commenting base
American southeast could single handedly power the country
I babysat a girl who came to me and asked if atoms were really little crosses, like her grandmother taught her. She was confused because the teacher at school was saying something different
I told her to listen to her teacher
Big incel energy with this comment