You don’t think coming to the conclusion “omg, this must be nuclear war preparations”, instead of this just being a regular target, is conspiracy level thinking?
It would fit right into Alex Jones’s show. And it’s the most upvoted comment here.
Is this a tinfoil conspiracy site? Tankie infowars?
It was Medvedev who started talking shit about nukes more than a year ago (and a lot since then)
This is of course in addition to just taking all the training data without credit or permission by both teams, which usually goes without saying these days.
Trains are expensive to run if you don’t have enough passengers (like in small villages).
Sounds like this was the strategy from the very beginning - get tons of attention with crazy unrealistic announcements, then later turn it into a boring old regular city after everyone already recognizes the name.
At least Android also proactively asks them whether to disable notifications for an app if they always swipe them away, or if they haven’t used the app in a long time.
You have to go where the people are.
The default now is that apps have to first request notification permissions, on both iOS and Android.
But what is the actual real-world practical solution for those people?
Are they now just going to be broke (or even in debt) with no place to live?
What about all those unfinished buildings that people got in debt to buy?
deleted by creator
not having its AI efforts actually change product usage
Are you ignoring Github Copilot?
Not directly related, but you can disable chat history per-device in ChatGPT settings - that will also stop OpenAI from training on your inputs, at least that’s what they say.
Not from memory, without looking at the original during painting - at least not to this level of detail. No human will just incidentally “learn” to draw such a near-perfect copy. Not unless they’re doing it on purpose with the explicit goal of “learn to re-create this exact picture”. Which does not describe how any humans typically learn.
It is a point against those “it’s just like humans learning” arguments.
This is another “use a black wallpaper to hide the notch” situation. Kinda funny, but ultimately meaningless.
They could, but even if they cut it to 0, assuming going from $226 million compensation (number I found for 2022, most of which by far is stock), and median employee costing $300k (I found a number around $270k median total comp, but the total cost is higher), that makes room for about 750 additional employees. Google has about 150k employees, so I think they’re laying off more than that. Of course there are other highly paid people in other top positions there too, but the thing about a CEO is, you only need one of them. If we would only consider cash, the number of employees would be much smaller.
This guy has a pretty good mini-series about Quibi’s failure https://youtu.be/kVJGTaE7Eio
Basically they are Hollywood people who were all like: all the other Hollywood people we know, who we talked about it with, loved it (the producers, who would make content for it).
But they never really checked whether the consumers - the people who would be actually paying for the service - even liked it enough to pay for it.
I can’t believe I have to explain this. Anyway
The comparison to Alex Jones and other conspiracy nutjobs was about how they don’t care about any facts or context, and just like to string together random headlines into some doomsday narrative that supports their view.
The phrase “tankie infowars” means basically that - same methods, just different target audience. So you would switch around who the good guys and bad guys are, but not much else.