Worth noting: “Visible includes mobile hotspot with unlimited data at speeds up to 5Mbps.”

Then it would be a total loss. Nothing’s out there.

It’s not over 'til it actually sinks. If they can tow it back to port, it might be repairable instead of a total loss.

I found them via IP address, so I don’t know anything about the company beyond that.

2a09:: 2a11:: and 2409:: are the shortest.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/family-laughing-at-crying-child-opening-christmas-present

That includes some history, but not the prompt itself.

I would say, anything whose spacetime geodesic (orbital/freefall path) intersects the spheroid defined by the surface of the Earth. Though by this definition, a comet on a 100-year collision course is already “on Earth”, so I’m not sure if that’s reasonable.

Drop the SPEED OF, just LIGHT. It’s cleaner.

Data centers […] have traditionally relied on renewable sources like solar and wind

I don’t think that’s really true. The green/grey graphs in this article show how difficult that is: https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/clean-energy/google-and-others-have-committed-to-24-7-carbon-free-energy-what-does-that-mean

light cyan, light magenta, light black, and light light black.

Roughly speaking, fd00::123 is the IPv6 equivalent of 192.168.0.123

A device on your private IPv4 network can send packets directly to 104.21.36.127 via NAT. How will it send packets to 2606:4700:3033::6815:247f? There’s not enough space in the IPv4 header.

You can statically number a LAN with fd00::/8 and NAT66 to the internet, if you really want to.

Solar PV tortillas taste awful and hurt my teeth.

I wonder if the Astral Plane charges property tax?

It’s not about how people write them, it’s how parsers parse them. IPv4 has been around since 1982, and most parsers interpret leading zeros as octal.

Because 1.2.3.4 and 1.02.003.04 both map to the same number.

But 10.20.30.40 and 010.020.030.040 map to different numbers. It’s often best to reject IPv4 addresses with leading zeroes to avoid the decimal vs. octal ambiguity.

Tuvalu only has 12,000 people. They could probably fit in the airport.

This is only good news if it displaces thermal coal and gas generating stations.

Is there another plausible scenario? Wind and solar are getting so cheap, that displacing either with nuclear is like flushing money down the toilet.

Ah, so he switched from smiting to torrenting. That explains a few things.