![](/static/f79995a8/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
And Timothy McVeigh.
And Timothy McVeigh.
Video proof can be deepfaked now. We’ll need to have recordings capture public keys of people in frame so they can be verified as real or not.
lol like management gives two shits about how browser agnostic a product is. business solutions look to address the perceived gap or need, not tailor to IT personnel feelings.
If an AI can outperform a human doctor, isn’t that a good thing? We should always strive to improve survival for patients - it’s not about doctors jobs but patient survival and long term health outcomes.
I would love for doctors to become AI if the AI improves our growing health inequities and inequalities.
But some smaller, more integrous and creative influencers might.
Good, maybe they’ll get a productive job then and stop forcing their attempts at being influencers. You either are or aren’t one; they clearly don’t have what it takes to influence their viewers to buy sponsor products as efficiently.
Advertising isn’t a noble business and influencers are just advertisers. There is no noble human spirit in advertising, it is (and always has been) an exploitative and ignoble career.
Purely as an investor: if they can sustain that revenue growth the IPO will be a smash.
Never invest in companies you love or you won’t exit when you should.
Agreed. Streaming services always seemed like gilded cages to me. You can only see what they allow you to see - piracy or old-school Netflix DVD delivery gives you all the options. The promise of being able to stream any content at any time, with the producers and people involved being able to get compensated fairly and justly, just isn’t reality with these ghouls running the show.
The model (in the current form, of artificially restricted licensing) seems like less a way to curate a media catalog, but more like a way to curate the subscribers and culture.
“I reject your reality and substitute my own!”
Based on the information the ad services know about individual viewers, they could customize the ads using invented models that perfectly match the viewers’ ethnicity/demographics.
IMO hyper-individualized ads that are personalized would increase diversity. It’d also be a new frontier in advertising manipulation.
That movie really holds up well, and I heard those rips are glorious
Played college ball ya know!
Telemetry DNS/API calls, not dialer calls.
Probably the >$1K US per GPU pricing - can’t move headsets if nobody can afford a capable enough GPU.
In San Francisco/Bay Area that doesn’t even cover a parking space per month.
In the US, the average home price sold was $495k. Where can you find a $100k house that doesn’t need a tear down or complete renovation?
Ask any woman, they’ll tell you that only applies to men.
Just assume everybody harvests your data. There’s no way to prove that they’re not liars and just doing it anyway.
There are several examples of companies and government agencies that have been caught doing things and retaining data they shouldn’t - only after a breach released all the info.
Home Depot wasn’t supposed to store credit cards but they did it anyway in violation of PCI, for example.
You could’ve just done it yourself if you felt so passionate about it. Badgering people into action rarely works.
Show me any car using Li-S or Lithium Titanate batteries that is sold and on the roads today.
The average age of cars on the road in America today is 12.5.
They better be attractive in 10 years or they won’t have an easy time with initial sales. The EV glut on dealer lots right now is representing that now - ICE vehicles are backlogged but EVs are plenty (but overpriced for their longevity).
Sorry, not in budget for this year. Do it in prod and write up the cap-ex proposal for next year.