![](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/40383ffd-08e0-4f7f-88be-1f4d61dbf2ec.jpeg)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/fed50129-04e7-4dbc-8f54-4ba5bae58370.png)
It is! It says so in the trailer
she/her
It is! It says so in the trailer
At the moment it feels like the proverb about gold rushs and shovels
Annas Archive mirrors all of Zlib, libgen and more
Alternatively the Zlib darknet site is still up, afaik
It’s static, yes, but the static price is orders of magnitude higher. It still involves loading the whole model into VRAM and performing matrix multiplication on trillions of numbers
It definitely doesn’t rhyme
I read your first comment and thought “I wonder if they’re studying physics too, this sounds way too relatable”. lo and behold
hang in there!
god, I hate capitalism
Result<_>
Another option, if you’re on Firefox, is to get the addon multi-account containers. That allows you to log in with multiple accounts since it keeps cookies separate
how do you recognize a non-vegan?
don’t worry, they’ll ask “how do you recognize a vegan?”
Most important stuff is loaded in RAM, so unless you’re downloading the stuff as well, you’re probably fine
There’s a very large overlap, but I can’t blame any minorities wanting to arm themselves in the current political climate. Arm queer people!
Bells inequality is a statement about math, it gives an inequality that could only be violated if there were no local hidden variables (read: if measurements were truly random). That was a statement of math, which is rigorously provable. It took experimental confirmation, but we can now say with high confidence that there are no local hidden variables (i.e. there is no information hidden that we simply cannot measure, instead the outcome is only decided the moment you measure).
Global hidden variables are still an option, but they would require much of the rest of physics to be rewritten
No problem! Interpretations of quantum mechanics are also still very much under discussion, and Bell’s inequality only says that there are no local hidden variables. While QM very accurately describes observations so far, it’s by no means solved, and there’s a good chance that a new theory will upend much of it in the future
He proved it mathematically, but it was only recently confirmed experimentally
it’s a matter of interpretation, but generally the consensus is that quantum measurements are truly probabilistic (random), Bell proved that there can’t be any hidden variables that influence the outcome
that just keeps the data in one physical location though