![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/82df2b8d-8e60-441f-aafc-5da196dbbe2c.webp)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0d5e3a0e-e79d-4062-a7bc-ccc1e7baacf1.png)
Lmao you’re giving me ideas
He / They
Software Developer
Lmao you’re giving me ideas
Ironically I reset my phone yesterday, this pops up every so often when I set up Telegram.
ITT: People who think they know better than security researchers
Oh! Oh! Block me too!
You’re talking about the blue stuff on a roll, right?
I have some and they are select-a-size.
OP has no interest in getting genuine answers to their question, they simply want people to agree with them.
Their response will be something along the lines of “Well I don’t object to it” or “It’s legal so it’s not wrong”.
Because I don’t care about power dynamics or maturity levels.
You do understand that what you’re saying here is that you choose to completely disregard whether something has been proven to harm others so long as it’s legal or you subjectively do not object to it?
You’ll make a great abuser, please never go into a relationship.
I think you’re stuck on the legal definition of an adult.
Some countries have people become adults at 16, some at 18 and some at 21. 18 is meaningless beyond the laws in place and the legal punishments given to those who break the laws.
Many other reprehensible acts are legal, such as firing people for their ethnicity or gender identity in the US, or running a payday loan scheme.
You need to look at it from the perspective of brain development and power dynamics rather than from a legal or subjective point of view.
Having sexual intercourse with someone below your level of mental maturity is considered morally reprehensible due to the mental harm it may cause to the younger person, and them being unable to consent properly due to the power dynamics of the older partner having more money, more maturity, more status, etc. The younger individual may become dependent on the more mature individual, further driving the negative power dynamic.
(Age / 2) + 7 is your answer.
A 26 year old shouldn’t be with someone younger than 20.
This is a guideline, but it’s generally correct. Especially until around 25 for the youngest partner, the problem comes down to maturity and the potential power dynamics at play due to that lack of mental maturity.
This does mean that an 18 year old can be with a 16 year old, and it’s perfectly fine as they may have roughly the same mental maturity.
You can still get a deal on occasion at Best Buy, but you have to be careful and you have to be ready to walk away.
Brendan Eich is a piece of shit
Wait I’m curious about the foot shortening thing. How and why?
Thanks for the context, I wasn’t aware, that’s pretty funny!
…you do know what GmbH stands for, right?
It’s like LLC or Corp.
Which I will lose, alongside the notepad.
Hell, I lose my phone and find my laptop in the laundry bins sometimes. ADHD is making me demented.
Not if you have ADHD, the barrier to success needs to be really low.
Searching for emails sucks balls compared to Outlook, and accessing any semblance of advanced search is not obvious as you have to go through the top bar.
I can’t even do from:email@address.com
in the search field, I have to go to advanced search, which is missing other features.
It’s not open-source without the license. I think they may be confusing source available with open source.
In the case of JavaScript, obfuscation turns source code into a compilation result for performance and “security” reasons. It removes unused tokens, comments, spaces, newlines, etc. to reduce the data transfer size.
So, by definition, non-obfuscated code is source code, as it is the code the compiled or built product originates from. However, most sites on the web don’t ship source code, only minified and obfuscated code.
Wait what was it originally
They’d have to prove malice first