I wonder what’s the largest that defederates with the most.
Almost definitely beehaw
I also wonder what’s the largest that gets defederated the most.
Probably exploding-heads. If not, then lemmygrad.
Definitely sh.itjust.works. The largest instance that defederates with the fewest other instances (though they could still do better here - there’s no reason to defederate either exploding-heads or lemmygrad), no email required on sign up, and a super chill vibe.
For me it’s anything I have to download an app to operate.
Phone by itself in left front pocket, facing leg. Keys and sundry in right front, wallet in back right, receipts in back left.
If this is the incident you’re referring to, then:
Updated Wednesday June 14 2:10 p.m. EST - San Francisco Police have provided this statement to Jalopnik:
“The SFPD is aware of the social media video showing an autonomous vehicle stopped in the middle of a road during a recent shooting incident in San Francisco. The autonomous vehicle did not delay police, fire, or other emergency personnel with our arrival or departure from this scene. Furthermore, it did not interfere with our investigation into the shooting incident.
Also, if the lives saved by autonomous cars are anywhere near as high as they’re supposed to be, isolated incidents are way more than worth it. Statements like “The very first time one of these things blocked emergency services, the whole project should have been shelved” are incredibly shortsighted and would result in orders of magnitude more deaths over time.
“Framerules” in Super Mario Bros. speedrunning on NES is probably the most memed analogy for a (very slightly) more complicated concept I know of.
The game can only send you to a new level every 21 frames (about .3 seconds), so there are tons of levels where timesaves don’t lead to any benefit, because you have to save a full .3 seconds in order to see any benefit.
In the community, this has been explained with the same analogy so many times that “Imagine there’s a bus” has become a well-known meme.
So, imagine there’s a bus that only leaves the station every .3 seconds (21 frames). Because the bus only leaves at the times on its schedule, arriving early for the bus doesn’t get you to your destination any faster, because you still have to wait for the time the bus will leave. For this reason, any new time saves in SMB1 must reach a new “framerule” (get there early enough to catch the previous bus) for there to be any real timesave.
Guardian needs to speak for itself - I had a great fourth!
… you yeet them off a cliff in your “documentary”?
Gotta hit up Bojangles for the best biscuits.
Dune. While there’s no way to perfectly capture the magic of the intricate machinations of (Frank) Herbert’s universe, the movie gets about as close as anyone could, I think. The only thing in its league is Jackson’s LOTR trilogy, and I think Dune is at least as good if not slightly better. Can’t wait for the second (and hopefully third!) one!
I didn’t see the post in question, but wanted to point out that this is an entirely too common misconstrual of Popper’s Paradox of Tolerance.
The complete relevant portion from Popper himself (emphasis mine):
“Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.”
Somewhat ironically, censorship in the name of the Paradox of Tolerance more often reflects the actual intolerance that Popper was referring to, but that’s been co-opted in the name of justifying silencing people whose opinions you don’t like.
It’s your community, so do what you want with it of course, but it irks me when people use the “Paradox of Tolerance” to justify the exact intolerance Popper was speaking against. The Paradox of Tolerance is intended to encourage debate, not to be used as a cudgel against those you disagree with, however horrible their opinions.
Here’s an easy way to test if the Paradox of Tolerance is relevant:
Is the person with intolerant ideas refusing to participate in discourse? Paradox of Tolerance applies; intolerance is justified according to Popper.
Is the person with intolerant ideas participating in discourse but you don’t like what they’re saying? Paradox of Tolerance is irrelevant here, and you probably shouldn’t use Popper as a crutch when you censor their opinions.
It’s a Lemmy thing, not just on jerboa. I just sort by “top day” to see the top posts from the past 24 hours. Once I’ve seen most of those, I switch to new all, which keeps a decent amount of new content coming through.
The platform is still young, so it’s a combo of a) not enough content yet and b) early sorting algorithms that paradoxically haven’t caught up with the influx of users yet.
You can just search here for communities https://browse.feddit.de/
Though I also browse /all/ to find new communities I might not think to search for.
Reddit has already begun replacing mods and forcing subs to go public again https://famichiki.jp/@Tsutsuku/110537730270070245
I feel exactly the same way. It’s incredibly refreshing, and really brings into perspective how far reddit has fallen in the past few years.
Finally finished base Monster Hunter Rise and starting to work my way through Sunbreak.
It’s… fine. If you like Rise, you’ll probably like Sunbreak too. If you prefer the older style of Monster Hunter games, it’s probably scratch your itch just enough to leave you feeling uncomfortable.
Yeah, this really is a game that the story killed. The gameplay is tight and fun, and overall it’s a fun experiment in the series that was ruined by the creator of the series completely misunderstanding why people like Samus as a character.
As long as the game is balanced and there are enough counterplays to camping, I’m fine with it.