GVasco

True that!

N is the number elements to be parsed by the function

n = 1 and you have O(1)

Not if modern proof of ownership technologies are implemented, such as NFT smart contracts.

That’s why NFT’s were created, but now that people link NFT’s to dumb ass pictures, I wonder how if ever it’ll make it as proof of ownership.

Sucks that vendors can keep such a tight control on what you can do with your device. Would be nice to have the possibility to safeguard your device with any OS of your choice.

Even when using another OS? Been trying to find info on relocking my /e/ OS install on my 1+7P and haven’t had any love luck.

Many can be easily unlocked

Using K-9 and quite liking it, otherwise just browse F-droid everything there is Foss.

Damn, that sucks! As if the currency collapse wasn’t enough.

Pay extra to pick it up yourself?! What sordid part of the world do you reside in? (Rhetorical if you don’t want to answer, just never heard of it!)

For sure! Yeah I was just remembering that shares get mounted as a drive when you access them. So makes sense.

Great to know! Thanks!

Maybe! I’d start checking dmesg logs and check the smart info provided you do regular tests. Otherwise do some SMART tests and check the results after.

Why? They are built for datacenter environment, with the right drives for high density storage they should be just as fine as in a regular server.

could try finding a cheap jbod

Interesting!

It’s neither, it’s a limitation of SMB, if you have multiple shares set-up that mount to the root of the SMB share, you can’t hardlink accross them, but inside a single share in the root of the SMB share apparently it’s not an issue.

Sure *are apps might not have a way of knowing but they are still limited by SMB’s limitations. If you’re sharing individual folders you simply can’t hardlink across them. But my bad for thinking SMB didn’t allow hardlink inside the same share mount point.

Narcissism and confirmation bias runs rampant in our governments and top executives.