yeah, some title gore going on here.
yeah, some title gore going on here.
I’m not even sure I understand what that means. is it a diss on America for being too privileged?
it’s not really war when one side can’t escape or retreat.
looks like we need ad blocker detection blockers now.
duh.
the point of saying allowed is that consumers and the market in general should not put up with it.
it’s pretty inconclusive if there’s no context for how that code is called. I’m kinda confused why the article wouldn’t have provided any additional detail other than a single line of code. why bother digging at all?
this is incredibly inaccurate. we just hired for a single position and got well over 250 applicants. a junior dev friend of mine says he and none of his friends can find work. with all the layoffs tech jobs are just very scarce right now.
apologies for the off topic, but this thread shows as 11 hours old and I only see 7 top level comments. for a major event mega thread I expected much more and I’m wondering if I’m doing Lemmy wrong somehow?
I understand and think the intended content is good. but who would post this with such an obvious layout flaw? it used to be posts with terribly distracting grammar whose intent was relatively easy to decipher. lately it feels like even more basic and obvious rules are being lazily ignored and even shared.
WE LIVE IN A SOCIETY.
couldn’t help but lol at this quote:
US copyright law is designed to adapt to the times.
it’s quite frustrating how much bandwagon hate and resistance there is to the basic concept of a trustworthy and decentralized system for proof of ownership. i find your thoughts to be very well written, patient and insightful.
yes, the initial and popular use case for NFTs has not been ideal as digital art is easy to copy. but it is not difficult to think of other applications that are far more useful - stocks/securities being the easiest one. almost any product of value could and should have an NFT associated with it. this would make validating authenticity and ownership extremely easy and cut out tons of brokering fees for certain things.
how did they censor? i saw so much fuck spez that didn’t seem to get censored at all.
Canada / BC. we use a gravity carbon filter for our water and since getting used to that i can usually taste the chlorine in regular tap water. what’s more is there is a pretty gross brown sludge that i have to clean off our filters about once a month. so that’s something too.
there are better solutions to dealing with festival toilets than avoiding pooping. my wife has built us our own portable solution that can even handle a shit. of course you have to immediately dispose of the bag if you do but it’s a small price to pay for avoiding the public potties.
to be fair, at least a few additional data points would be required to call that proven. german culture has a particular history which i think must contribute to the ability for this to work.
SENKORSHIP
i can’t believe you’ve asked this! user voting is everything! without it there’s no way to meaningfully rank the content. i prefer to browser top-day posts because i only want to see what the majority of people have decided is worth seeing. surely you can imagine that browsing a randomly sorted list would be full of boring and uninteresting posts!
what qualifies you to make such a blanket statement?