![](/static/f79995a8/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
It’s a gimmick to give the law a recognizable name, usually related to the content of the law itself. It’s caught on here and just kinda stuck.
It’s a gimmick to give the law a recognizable name, usually related to the content of the law itself. It’s caught on here and just kinda stuck.
Literally the debate is happening because games and media have vanished… including Ubisoft games!
I’ve also assumed the same. There’s no way it’s a rare enough edge case not to be impactful
Big corps keep cutting people, small jobs can’t keep a consistent roster. Everything is good…
I think we’ll have moved on to hunter3 by then.
Yeah, my guess is that it’s the lack of a front grill that makes them look goofy to people. You’ll get used to it.
I’m somewhat surprised to hear it’d be as high as 50%. Pleased, but surprised.
Sounds like they’re taking efforts to fix this like 5-10 years too late.
Huh. I would not have expected the time of year to be part of the input prompts.
Carbon neutral means you try to “offset” your carbon. It’s half scam, half helpful. The idea is if your company produces an unavoidable amount of carbon, you offset this by supporting Carbon-free solutions elsewhere making your net production “neutral”. It’s a scam because sometimes the offset is stuff that was never going to produce carbon, and also because using other areas to claim “neutral” causes a weird double count. Carbon neutral is less good of a solution than carbon free, but it’s a step in the right direction.
However, target year of 2050?? Fucking what? That’s not something to brag about, that’s painfully and embarrassingly slow. That’s embarrassingly slow to be carbon free, much less carbon neutral.
There’s also a large number of Linux users that act like it’s infinitely easy and complication free.
The wording seems pretty clear, they locked it at 170 replies.
It messes with a ton of my common actions and doesn’t make them better. Things being hidden behind weird actions now. Some of it will just require me to get used to it, but some of it seems genuinely more cumbersome to perform.
You’re not obligated to pay them if you don’t want to.
Honestly, we need tech business news vs technology in general, but technology also probably should be split between hardware and software. Or maybe computer vs the rest.
I would wager most of us haven’t.
I mean, yes, but a lot of them also think it’s a conspiracy where world leaders are trying to vaccinate everyone because ??? Those types will start avoiding ultrasound to not get tricked into getting vaccinated.
I just want more car options and less truck/SUV options
I’m guessing Microsoft fits in basically having seen an opportunity and swept in. I doubt they have any “angle” in this other than “oh shit big name tech guy just lost his job and he’s skilled in stuff we want to be skilled in? grab him now”
Oh for sure. Especially with how many laws effectively get a name opposite of what they actually do. People read the name and vote based on that, without actually Knowing what the law does.