• 0 Posts
  • 57 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle









  • As a programmer, I disagree. This isn’t the users fault, it’s the shells and filesystems for being too permissiv. Honestly the shell is a bad choice for pin point acting on files anyways. I say this as a heavy user but selecting files is the most annoying part of using the shell and the solution isn’t warping your filenames to make them easier to type without shell weirdness, it’s using tools built to prevent these issues. That can either be tab complete (with zsh it auto escapes shell characters) or a terminal file manager like lf.




  • In general yes. You can think of each container in a docker network as a host and docker makes these hosts discoverable to each other. Docker also supports some other network types that may not follow this concept if you configure them as such (for example if you force all containers to use the same networking stack as one container (I do this with gluetun so I can run everything in a vpn) all services will be reachable only from the gluetun host instead of individual service hosts).

    Furthermore services in a container are not exposed outside of it by default. You must explicitly state when a port in a container is reachable by your host (the ports: option).

    But getting back to the question at hand, what you’re looking for is a reverse proxy. It’s a program that accepts requests from multiple requested and forwards them somewhere else. So you connect to the proxy and it can tell based on how you connect (the url) whether to send the request to sonarr or radarr. http://sonarr.localhost and http://radarr.localhost will both route to your proxy and the proxy will pass them to the respective services based on how you configure it. For this you can use nginx, but I’d recommend caddy as it’s what I’m using and it makes setting up things like this such a breeze.





  • I mean, if you can afford it you should support industries. I pirate a lot. Movies. Games. Music. Etc. Nothing wrong with that IMO, at this point piracy is the closest we can get to true ownership over anything because the entire industry has f*cked over consumer rights for assumed profit. But I still buy physical releases because I don’t want content I enjoy to die and I like building a collection of good content. Blurays are great (although also DRM encumbered :/), nothing beats the smell of new manga, and at this point music streaming is just a far better experience than piracy (I use qobuz). If you’re young or poor then do what you have to to enjoy yourself. If you’re an adult with a great salary then don’t be an entitled prick. If theirs ways to support content you enjoy you should. If such ways aren’t provided like most Netflix originals not having blurays then f*ck Netflix release some blurays if you want my money.




  • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
    cake
    toPrivacy@lemmy.mlPlease, do not use Brave.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Pretty much the only reason I use brave. 99% of the time librewolf. I don’t wanna go through the effort of installing chromium and an ad blocker and all that other stuff for the 1% of sites that are broken on firefox for me so brave it is. Really I just wish there was a chrome repackage with all this stuff out of the box. God knows chrome and chromium will never be that.