Those are rookie numbers son, you gotta get on that.

You need to update your ISO.

Well, now they just make you throw out the old Mac hardware and buy new for $1299 (8gb RAM lol) because it’s now out of support for the latest MacOS and the newest versions of Adobe Suite/MS Office/insert productivity work related proprietary software suite here is on board with Apple’s bullshit and won’t run on older MacOS versions.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

What if I told you you can make a backup of a config file and edit a single line in a conf file, all with a single line of bash?

sudo cp config.conf config.conf.bak.$(date +"%Y%m%d%H%M%S") && sed -i 's/^\(CONFIG_NAME\s*=\s*\).*/\1new_value/' config.conf

Yeah, totally.

Just imagine trying to do this with Windows Powershell, without a package manager like chocolatey to make it simple like linux…

$workdir = "c:\installer\"

If (Test-Path -Path $workdir -PathType Container)

{ Write-Host "$workdir already exists" -ForegroundColor Red}

ELSE

{ New-Item -Path $workdir  -ItemType directory }

$source = "https://download.mozilla.org/?product=firefox-latest&os=win64&lang=en-US"

$destination = "$workdir\firefox.exe"

if (Get-Command 'Invoke-Webrequest')

{

     Invoke-WebRequest $source -OutFile $destination

}

else

{

    $WebClient = New-Object System.Net.WebClient

    $webclient.DownloadFile($source, $destination)

}

Start-Process -FilePath "$workdir\firefox.exe" -ArgumentList "/S"

Start-Sleep -s 35

rm -Force $workdir/firefox*

Dope is 100% also used for weed. Maybe just less common for the younger gens.

Always have, and always will! /waves old man cane around in a threatening manner

Don’t try to fuckin understand me, just let me escape from reality, ain’t nobody telling me what to do, or what not to do, this is my life, this is my computer, so…

It was a tongue in cheek joke, calm yourself, this isnt reddit.

But it’s also a valid, if cheeky, point that it wasnt really a fresh from scratch effort.

NT was written from scratch

You mean OS/2 3.0?

When development started in November 1989, Windows NT was to be known as OS/2 3.0, the third version of the operating system developed jointly by Microsoft and IBM.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT

If Red Hat wasn’t owned by IBM, I’d maybe give a flying fuck about being amused.

/still salty

Stop acting like a redditor.

So my 16 year account with 90k legit comment karma wasnt good enough to be invited?

Now I dont get to early participate in the fomo panic IPO being forced by investors?

I could’ve made or lost tens of dollars.

Wordpress.com sites are trash.

Wordpress as a CMS otherwise is fine.

Yes, you need to use Oxygen Builder, Divi, or Elementor to WYSIWYG effectively.

Yes you need to have daily backups and a security tool like Wordfence or WPMUDev’s Defender.

But it works, its easy to build and migrate, it integrates with everything you want it to, and the content creation and management is super simple for an end user to manage. You can also get support for it from everywhere and anywhere at this point.

Reality: Everything sucks and you have to adapt and adjust to bullshit on any and every CMS you work with.

The irony of your propaganda account posting about propaganda is full flavored.

When I first meet someone I try to say their name repeatedly to help remember it.

And I’ve never apologized for being christian…

/throws molotov

BORTLES!

Even the labelling itself in this case is part of the satire.

I’m saying satire falls under protected speech already, period. Your position requires it doesn’t.

Is Alec Baldwin appearing on SNL as Donald Trp considered Satire?

How different is the end result as a from a human prompt guided AI creation, created by comedians that is mimicking any public persona at all?

As far as your understanding of the nuances, what is the specific reasoning and background providrd from the creators themselves on this?

Looks a lot like you, among many others, are just reacting with the anti AI pitchfork crowd and throwing mud at anyone that doesnt fall into the narrative bubble you prefer on this.

Removed by mod

It’s blatantly meant as satire and obviously within the protections of the First Amendment.

I wholesale disagree that they crossed a line at all.

And they deserve to lose the lawsuit on First Amendment grounds. Full stop.

Anyone that actually knows the story behind it from a context beyond the anti-AI circlejerking narratives knows it was a form of comedic parody put together by comedians.