Fuck you dumbass continue to eat up propaganda moron

Yes.

Look there are racists everywhere, that is a fact. Calling Azov a far right group is a Russian smear attempt.

For Azov the big proof is Andrey Biletsky, look him up. In 2011 he was a far-right pro Russian Ukrainian. That’s sorta what far-right means in Ukraine, pro Russian. It also means white supremacist specifically anti-LGBT and antisemitism.

This article doesn’t bother to speak on what far-right means in Ukraine or how that stance has been challenged in Ukraine. This article really doesn’t say much about anything useful to understand this far-right identity in Ukraine it just uses the term to make liberals pearl clutch.

Ukraine is being invaded if racists wanna pick up a gun and defend it go ahead but the identity of far-right in Ukraine tends to be pretty pro Russian. Meaning a lot of that identity right now is likely in shambles and being challenged.

It is just a disingenuous article. Nothing else to say about it. The entire thing is just “ooh spooky far right Ukraine!”

Like come on you eat this up?

Bullshit propaganda supported by disingenuous supporters of this instance.

Any day now those vaxxed will drop dead!!

Good Russians getting a taste of their own bullshit.

Maybe once citizens have to deal with the war they’ll be actually effectively mad about it.

Is it tho

I actually did but now your comment made me reject the article and I’m back at square one. Guess I’ll play another person’s favorite game instead of what I wanted to play

Solution for what

More people watch it probably? Right?

All EVs still require coal or oil for the electricity. And that doesn’t even factor in mining for the metals to make these things.

EV are okay but they’re not a solution to our resource consumption problem.

What we do know is that casualty ratios are fairly consistent across a large number of wars, and this helps us use public source data effectively. We have very little hard data. But what data we do have suggests that Ukraine’s casualties are higher than Russia’s.

oh okay it’s crap

have you been to russia

why do you think that??

Private just makes more money and also you can do ridiculous shit like blow up your own rocket, destroying a landing pad in the process and ignore environmental and labor laws.

lol “innovation” what is this 1925?

how innovative are the cars being produced because they look the same.

half those medicines are publicly funded

the Internet is publicly funded.

this belief of private sector innovation is not as true as they sell it to be.

Everything should.

Medicine. Internet. Waste disposal.

That’s not what’s being said here. Not Sony losing rights to a game, just entirely being unable to provide proof of ownership on digital content.

I’ve had Microsoft do this to me for Minecraft during their transition to owning it where they claimed I didn’t own the game. I had to legitimately email them a picture of a receipt I owned to get my account back. Had I not had that receipt I’d not have the game.

I’ve never had Sony do this but I hear they’ve done this exact thing to people in other ways usually DLCs.

With NFTs there’s a third party undeniable proof of purchase and ownership. It takes that whole side away from the distributor giving power to the consumer.

In a better world I could then sell that NFT and proof of purchase and the company would honor it for the person I sold it to allowing for the resale of digital content.

Back with GameStop the hope was the ability to sell/trade digital content like games. Because you actually own the digital content and the proof of purchase, closest to digital ownership I’ve seen.

PlayStation out here taking games after people bought them and shit is a strong reason for NFTs imo

I mean low key it’s supposed to be a receipt that can’t be copied. The receipt being slapped onto an image is what most associated with NFTs but it’s more just like a code that provides proof of purchase/ownership because you can trace the history on the block chain

the world outside touch grass