Yep. Prior to last year if person X told me person Y was antisemitic, my opinion of person Y would have dropped.
Today? It’s about a 33% chance for each of X, Y or both being pieces of shit.
Yep. Prior to last year if person X told me person Y was antisemitic, my opinion of person Y would have dropped.
Today? It’s about a 33% chance for each of X, Y or both being pieces of shit.
I think that’s my main complaint with the game. Once you find a way to beat the boss, you just go for that build every time. It’s so punishing and the path to get there is so long, that it’s a massive disincentive to try new things.
Abiotic Factor and Satisfactory
Negativity bias is real! I was reminding myself just today that for every act of hatred, there are ten thousand acts of love or kindness happening unreported all over the world. In homes, on the streets at the store…
Don’t let the news get you down. Things aren’t as bad as all that.
I’m currently using Unraid for pretty much every thing you listed, and I love it so much. I really appreciate being able to set up almost everything through the web interface. It makes my hobbies feel fun rather than just an extension of my day job.
That said, I bought the licence before they switched to a subscription model. So if I were starting over I might look into free alternatives.
You can still buy a lifetime subscription for Unraid, it’s just a lot more expensive.
100% this.
For me I got so immersed in the world and character that it didn’t even occur to me to save scum. This RPG is so good that I actually felt like I was living the story. The only game that ever managed to accomplish that.
You do if third party clients aren’t possible? You have control over what client the receiving end is using.
But apparently third party clients are possible, so it’s moot.
Of course, I fully agree! My point was just that you can eliminate the risk of poorly implemented cryptography at the endpoints. Obviously there’s a thousand and one other ways things could go wrong. But we do the best we can with security.
Anyway apparently third party clients are allowed after all? So it’s a moot point.
Excellent point! If I’m sending someone information that could get me killed if it were intercepted by the state, I’d sure as hell want some guarantees about how the other side is handling my data. Disallowing third party clients gives me at least one such guarantee.
I wouldn’t recommend talking to your cat about Satanism. The best bet is to just hope they never find out about it.
Cool makes sense, thanks for the reply! And yeah, I don’t think I’m quite there yet.
Out of curiosity, what’s the benefit of splitting those?
I’ve been meaning to try Caddy, but I just can’t even imagine something simpler than NginxProxyManager.
This is the best take I’ve seen on the whole kerfuffle so far.
Huge “I think about you all the time / I don’t think about you at all” vibes.
It’s a template to help set all the security and privacy hardening features that Firefox already ships with but are disabled by default.
They didn’t sell your data before
Firefox has been funded by ads from the beginning, and has had sponsored tiles (aka ads) since around 2014 I think?
I personally think there’s a difference between selling ads and selling your data too. I’m going to go on a limb and say you see no distinction.
I think you touched on how to make pay it forward work: make it as low effort as possible.
In this case, while you had lots of work, the people “paying it forward” had almost none. Thus the chain was able to go for as long as you were willing.