Good read. Makes sense and not even that complex, good that they did this experiment anyway just to prove it out to those less technical and try to get prevention steps out there.
The web UI was also vastly superior to Hotmail or Yahoo
It’s pretty drastically harder to register 100 phone numbers, especially in your target region, than 100 email addresses. Major spammers and such work with automation across many accounts, this isn’t designed around someone with 10 accounts.
No, it’s a layered model like Docker. They depend on various images that can be shared across applications targeting the same runtime.
Because Stardust said “Get a Steam Deck and then you’ll see why” which makes no sense in the context of Denuvo DRM, hence it is most likely Stardust confusing anti cheat issues for DRM ones. Not that hard to figure out.
Well, in the context of the Steam Deck, DRM works fine and anti-cheats often don’t.
No, and it runs denuvo games fine. It’s things like EAC or EA Anti-Cheat that break on Deck/Linux.
Yes, but it is Linux. OP doesn’t mention GNU.
“pacman -S nvidia”
Or preferably nvidia-tkg but that needs a git clone first
*per open file
vim (and especially neovim) have WAY more features than vi and different shortcuts. Running vim with the “vi” symlink emulates vi and disabled a lot.
Maybe your browser is blocking tracking or other cookies that adblockers also target.
It is an X thing. Wayland is a protocol not a display server though, so for Wayland the Wayland compositor has to implement it (Mutter in this case)
I haven’t used it because most games don’t work or have as good of performance. Benefits in short term will be things like in-tree kernel module, better working relationship and bug fixes with open projects like KDE/Gnome and maybe things like Gamescope or VR.
Now, if you want. There will probably always be tradeoffs between the two drivers so I doubt this will ever match Nvidia’s across the board, just have to pick your poisons.
No, I think Canonical just removed the Deb from their repos. Mozilla can build it but you need to install it from them, the one in the default Ubuntu package is just a redirect to the Snap
I’m pretty sure that’s why he said that
Yes, and? That reinforces what I’m saying. As long as they don’t install the cookies, the user can browse the site without seeing the banner. Therefore if the user blocks the banner, they can’t install the cookies, that doesn’t mean they can’t show the user the site.
Not sure what’s hard to understand here.
What’s wrong with the Flatpak permissions system on Linux?