I’m sorry but I never voted for Merkel. Nor any of the other governments that ended up in power.
I’m sorry but I never voted for Merkel. Nor any of the other governments that ended up in power.
Overtaking LePen on the right. Yeah right. Funny talk coming from a liberal. How about you get your shitty ass out of here before you “accidentally” empower some fascists again.
I’m more against the right than you could ever dream to be.
Liberal really throwing a fit here. European is European. An European event is by definition for Europeans.
Nice speech, but I do not care.
Yes I’d kick Turkey out too. As much as Turks want to pretend, they’re not European either.
What does that have to do with Xenophobia? You a liberal throwing around baseless accusations?
Not that I care about the political show of Eurovision, but it’s made for Europe. Meaning only Europeans should participate.
Yes
Simply removing them on the grounds of not being European should be easy enough and have happened as soon as they were let it. Same with Australia.
And potentially cause growing class consciousness? Never, better not give those dirty labourers anything worthwhile.
Physical violence is a necessity.
As you noted states can have tools against fascism and other takeovers themselves. Physical violence can be one of those tools first. Historically seen its the most successful tool. Nothing has made more fascists disappear than deadly force.
Simply taking away their platform and organisations is not enough. This isn’t exclusive to fascism, but political movements in general. They will still remain a danger that way. They would still be a threat to real democracies, if we had any, by still being able to abuse and manipulate the system, swindling their way into power or undermining established constitutions, rights and laws. And in undemocratic systems they still can take over simply by corruption, propaganda or working their way up by more honest means.
It has been a while, but look at how in the 89-91 plenty of governments have been overthrown despite banned oppotisions.
Why is the top comment some stereotype trying to explain away the results?
The statement is definitely populist though. It’s used by politicians for political gain. Not on some legal or moral base.
That is just polemic though. Populists saying this phrase, does not make it a reality. The German state is separate from Israel and it’s right to exist.
Gotta hope China can actually pull through with the whole road and belt initiative. Otherwise it will be a giant project only wasting billions upon billions.
I’d say there is a difference between politics and regular hobbies at the workplace. Religion is a very political issue, one about your worldview and beliefs.
I mean there already are illegal things that are completely valid like buying drugs. Or possibly donating to causes and organisation which might be deemed criminal overnight, take for example the last generation.
I really hope whenever it comes into a decision regarding that in many years that our courts won’t bend the knee to the corporations again.
Hopefully won’t happen. With a digital Euro there would be no privacy. Imagine wanting to spend your money on illegal things and the responsible authorities would be automatically notified of that.
No I want democratic workplaces. But also workplaces without religion nonetheless.
This isn’t about banning people from wearing their religious merchandise in public. This is banning religious objects from workplaces. More precisely just public workplaces. Of course a secular state should also have secular workplaces. And the way labour rights are personal life can be completely banned from your workplace. Why would religion be treated differently?
At the end of the day all mass media is owned by one super rich person or another. Or a group of them.