Yeah, I think you’re looking for Monica at this point.

it’s a bunch of loose files, basically. If you wanted it actively hosted, you’d just need to put them into a web server, basically.

Well, that’s why raw or flash pasteurized milk is almost impossible to get into supermarkets here in Germany. The regulations are crazy, if it’s possible at all.

They have me by the wallpapers!

Close as “won’t fix”. Easy. That’s what their customer service does to your ticket, too, if it’s too much to handle, so…

Do I have to enable backports for that package?

Or Trump up some wild charges about tax fraud or something

So we want Google and such to ignore laws when we think they should be ignored? Who decides which is which then?

I don’t get the premise of posts like that. We scold Google and other corps for not following the laws they are supposed to follow (data protection for example).and then we scold them for daring to follow lawmakers, when we don’t like the laws they follow. Which is it?

I haven’t been using pluseaudio for an eternity, since the Linux machines I use are mostly headless,.yet I was a pluseaudio fanboy when it was.just replacing ALSA. Yet, the hours and hours pulseaudio cost me to fix some upmix that had stopped working or some other weird shit… IDK if I’d still preach it’s upsides would I be in the same situation now.

How can this be damaging if you ain’t trying to sell it to us in the first place?

Perhaps what they developed is a bunch of Windows 2005 Servers stacked on top of each other

Perhaps their “stack” only ever uses caddy

Can we all agree to call this vulnerability “Poobear”?

nonono! That’s too fast! No, no! I’m scared! Terrified! Make was one thing but make install? I need to call my therapist, the anxiety is taking over again!

I know it’s scary, but you gotta make at some point!

You can make your speakers go BRRRRRRRRR via Home Assistant with it

But are you using Arch tho?

Welcome back to TIM BER BORNERS

Let me break down the explanations given, because most of them boil down to this:

As a noun, yes, because it’s mainly used in biology like that (“A hawk female”) and thus can come off as dehumanizing. As an adjective: No (“A female cashier”, “A male cashier”)