![](/static/f79995a8/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
If we can’t find something to live for, we will find something to die for.
This one is a good one too, in the article as well.
If we can’t find something to live for, we will find something to die for.
This one is a good one too, in the article as well.
five 9’s or two nines or maybe even one nine. maybe one nine.
This is the first time I hear this expression, what does it mean?
If it’s about having your blog serve as AI training, it doesn’t really matter where you host it, it’s going to get scrapped and included in the data.
I’m currently going to through the BBC classics ultimate story collection. I also liked the BBC radio 4 rendition of Dorian grey. The radio ones tend to have multiple voices and some special effects. I also loved the blade trilogy by Joe Abercrombie.
If you like sci-fi, I can recommend the children of time and deepness in the sky. Vernor vinge also has a novella in audio format called fast times at Ridgemont high.
Audio books are nice. I like short story collections where each story is maybe 20 to 40 minutes long.
I highly suggest you ban what the were advertising and not just the account.
If advertiser’s realize the shady bot farms they deal with are causing any comment that mentions their product to be automatically deleted, they will stop.
The way I see it, it would be coupled with the tool and not the intention someone has with it. So every microwave would render it properly at all time, as well as most electronics just by their very nature, regardless of what the person plans to do with it.
Actually I think they can probably just approximate the microwave stuff and just keep the electrical tools rendering like oscilloscopes.
They only need to render for things that give an exact measurement, the microwave trick has a 3% tolerance which is huge in the scope of things.
It seems like a lot but it’s less than simulating every single atom imo.
There would be no need to go that far at all times is what I’m saying. It’s the equivalent of a game rendering stuff far away only when you use a scope. Why render everything at all times if it isn’t being used and does not affect the experience. It would augment the overhead by an insane amount for little to no gain.
This is also just a thought exercise.
If it was a simulation, there would be no need to go that far. We simulate physics without simulating the individual atoms.
None of it would be real, the microscopic effects would just be approximated unless a precise measurement tool would be used and then they would be properly simulated.
We wouldn’t know the difference.
I don’t follow. If there are others it would render for them just as much as me. I’m saying it wouldn’t need to render at an automic level except for the few that are actively measuring at that level.
Atoms and photons wouldn’t actually exist, they would be generated whenever we measure things at that level.
Obviously, there’s many ways to interpret what kind of simulation it would be. A full simulation from the big band is fun but doesn’t make for good conversation since it would be indistinguishable from reality.
I was thinking more of a video game like simulation, where the sim doesn’t render things it doesn’t need to.
New human instances are being created, and as our society’s general education keeps going up, they demand more processing power.
As our tech goes up, this has to be simulated as well. Not only things like telescopes and the LHC, but your computer who’s running a game world doesn’t actually exists and it’s the super computer who’s running it.
Obviously, this is just a drop in the bucket for an entity that can make a fully simulated universe but the situation quickly becomes untenable if we start creating hyper advanced simulation as well, we are maybe only a few decades away.
So is it the pedo next in line?
I don’t think there would currently be an open source scene on the llm front without meta and their llama model. They really kickstarted things.
They literally sabotaged the business model of Google and Microsoft because they weren’t part of the club.
I’m guessing they are destroying their rivals moat so they can have a chance to build their own but I really dig when corporations bring each other down instead of colluding, even if it’s for the wrong reasons.
If you are warry of all of them I don’t think the argument is aimed at you.
Many people think tik too is the devil while willingly feeding the other ones. Not to mention that the hate aimed at tik too is mostly manufactured by the government.
I think the point is that all of them should be held to a higher standard, not just the one owned by foreigners.
I did imagine it immediately in a panic after hitting the car.
I wonder if the witness followed it at a brisk pace while on the phone with the cops.
That’s probably the best stance.
I guess I see the leaks as a direct consequence to the action of various agencies and military, and I’m conflicting villainizing Snowden and villainizing the leaks themselves.
The government got caught red handed and I can’t really see myself being on any side other than the one directly opposite to them on the issue.
If the gov didn’t want its secrets out in the open, they shouldn’t have been spying on their citizens. Maybe there would be less sympathy if the leaks didn’t bring to light the bombing of Bagdad full of civilians in the middle of the night and how the military hid it.
Maybe it was all for the money and Snowden is just a dick, but I’m glad he did it.
You would lose ownership the moment they found out about it. I’m not really sure I understand your point and it comes off as a huge false comparison. There is a difference between the laws that are there to protect the general population and the ones meant to protect corporate profits.
I could see trump being anti mutant