![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5d5a78b8-d06b-4909-92e0-b779a5038d25.jpeg)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Why would someone make a lot of money from this?
I am not so much disappointed as I am blinded with rage.
Why would someone make a lot of money from this?
From my experience, most of the time they’re healthier too!
A lot of store-brand products either don’t use as much sugar, or salt or saturated fats then their big brand counter parts.
Wait General Reposti is based off of General Kenobi? I just thought it was some Italian General.
What about the regular engineers? I hardly ever hear about those guys and AI.
I don’t care, you’re not to use static!
I’m the Tony Stark.
So burn her in her sleep, like the rest of us, and move on!
Is it fair that I have to post a source when someone criticizing doesn’t?
If you’re trying to debunk a myth or call someone’s BS, then yes a source should be your opening statement. Is it fair? No. Is it necessary? Absolutely.
With all that said thank you for providing the source. A very well written one it was. I am going to debunk this myth now too, if and when I see it.
Context and source?
deleted by creator
I think that’s part of the fetish.
Why Amsterdam specifically?
Is it selling fake AI images? Or fake images made by AI?
Would you say this is better than using a VPN or just as good?
deleted by creator
Well I appreciate your optimism. Let’s hope you’re right.
I’m not quite sure what you’re getting at. The basic idea is to be able to easily trace back wether or not a photo has been edited, as well as provide some level of proof the photo is authentic. However this is just a lock waiting to get picked to me. Hence my cat and mouse analogy.
Why do I feel like everytime I hear news such as: “Thing will fight against A.I.” Is either a scam or a bandaid to a flood.
I don’t mean to be negative. But fighting software with software, like this, feels like a cat and mouse game.
Why does this look so authentic?