Good point about root exploit. It’s a potential.
Thing is, every Linux server and windows box suffers the same risk… But we don’t hear “the sky is falling” about those… Because it’s considered a measured risk and security is layered. As it should be.
Hell, people still run windows laptops unencrypted today - which is far worse than an unlocked bootloader on Android.
Oh that’s cool to hear about. Neat!
Hour of cardio? Maybe 2!😲
From what I’ve read, that doesn’t really work - you’d need the encryption key, not the pin/password, because of how the encryption platform works.
Again, it’s been a while, and this isn’t my field. I just remember being properly surprised at how little I understood - that the pin/password are merely keys to accessing the encryption key, and it’s all tied together in validating during hoot. Like you can’t image the system and drop it in another phone if it’s been encrypted, even if you have the pin - the encryption system on the different hardware would calculate things incorrectly (I did this once, dropped an encrypted image on a duplicate phone. That was fun trying to figure out why it wouldn’t work).
There’s more to the puzzle that’s frankly above my pay grade, but last time I read about how to get into an encrypted phone, (even boot unlocked) required the expertise and tools of certain types of folks. Not your average “haxxor”.
Granted, that expertise and those tools are getting closer to us every day…
It requires a flashed rom with a valid (key signature? Crap, forget what it’s called).
If you flash an unsigned kernel and try to boot lock, it’ll brick.
I get from an absolute security perspective why this is deemed important, I just feel there’s a bit too much focus on it, as if an unlocked bootloader is really that insecure. It would still take tremendous effort to get the encryption key for storage, so it’s pretty effectively secure still.
Exactly!
“You can’t out run a bad diet”.
Exercise helps, but once you do the math and see how many calories hard exercise consumes vs how easy it is to eat more calories, it becomes very clear.
If you can’t see how you moved them, I can’t help you.
Nice comparisons. Will add that to my explanations.
Thanks!
Oh crap, you already done lost me in the second half there, but I’ll give the link a watch.
Thanks again!
I’ve worked with folks from around the world (including Central and South Americans), some can be touchy about it. Had to tell them “sorry, I, as an American, don’t define these terms. Blame Europeans, not me”.
“US”, “America”, “Americans” all have specific denotations… per EMEA, and hell, even Canadians.
It’s like nicknames - if you have one, you didn’t choose it. It was earned or applied by someone else.
Did you just finish Sophistry 101? Cause that’s all we’re hearing out of you.
I mean you’ve climbed up on the cross, and it looks like you’re even putting the nails in yourself.
Save some wood for Jesus.
Yea, that’s on the asswipe saying that. We get to meet them everywhere.
That description of American Colonists is exactly why there was a rebellion.
The English treated the colonists like second-class citizens, going so far as to try to get Ben Franklin to answer for things like the Tea Party, while he was in England, and a Loyalist.
The simplistic “rebelled over taxation” is just a representation of how the Crown and European Brits viewed and treated the colonists.
Colonists didn’t quit Britain, the Briton’s quit on the Colonists.
Got any more goalposts you’d like to move?
Half? No.
Closer to 98%.
Europeans are just as jingoistic as anyone else. And just as ignorant.
Let the arseholes bring their ideas into the light, so we know who they are and what they think.
Suppression is just a bad idea, and your naivete is terrifying.
Don’t see why this was removed. Though it does go right back to OP’s victim mentality.