Someone tried to build a stairway to heaven but got bored when the song ended.

It would be just a matter of time before they can distinguish between good and bad data; there are already AI that can do just that. I’d like to do something like that on GitHub though:P

Code review can’t fix incompence though. I lost count of how many times my boss told me “review that PR well because X is not very good”. Also my point is that they are overrated, not that they are useless.

Probably unpopular opinion, but peer reviews are overrated. If coders are good AND know the project, the only thing you can do in a PR is nitpicking. They are more useful for open source collaborators because you want to double-check their code fits with the current architecture. But people here are reacting as if peer reviews could actually spot bugs that tests can’t catch. That happens rarely unless the contributor is junion/not good.

I would fire you for incompetence and sabotage. Problem solved.

Follow up of: “Mmm… should I put lifecycle annotation in these 10 structs or just use and Rc and call it a day?”. Rc and Box FTW.

I second this game. The cat can also find a mate abd have kittens