• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle


  • Oh, nothing about it sounds unrealistic, just kinda pointless. There absolutely are rugged laptops and gaming laptops and probably even some combination of the two out there somewhere. But they both tend to be quite expensive and nothing you mentioned seemed to indicate the need for portability. So, why a laptop and not a desktop? You’ll get a lot more bang for your buck and can have the exact keyboard, cooling system and whatever else you want, plus a much more repairable system.





  • Take a look at what even the proposer is saying wouldn’t be allowed in:

     (1) new and delete.  There's no way to pass GFP_* flags in.
    
     (2) Constructors and destructors.  Nests of implicit code makes the code less
         obvious, and the replacement of static initialisation with constructor
         calls would make the code size larger.
    
     (3) Exceptions and RTTI.  RTTI would bulk the kernel up too much and
         exception handling is limited without it, and since destructors are not
         allowed, you still have to manually clean up after an error.
    
     (4) Operator overloading (except in special cases).
    
     (5) Function overloading (except in special inline cases).
    
     (6) STL (though some type trait bits are needed to replace __builtins that
         don't exist in g++).
    
     (7) 'class', 'private', 'namespace'.
    
     (8) 'virtual'.  Don't want virtual base classes, though virtual function
         tables might make operations tables more efficient.
    

    C++ without class, constructors, destructors, most overloading and the STL? Wow.




  • When I was a very junior EE I ended up working mostly on microcontroller code. There was one bit of extremely ugly code I inherited that parsed a terribly designed serial communication protocol by using a giant maze of nested if statements. I really wanted to rewrite it to something better, but I never quite came up a solution while I worked there. Years later after I was no longer at the company I had a stress dream about it and finally came up with a working solution. I still wish I could go fix it. I really hope it’s no longer used, or that someone else has finally fixed it.


  • They are people who have fallen for and/or are grifting for a deeply unhinged conspiracy theory that national laws don’t apply to them if they do some certain set of pseudo legal things. What exactly those things are, as well as what laws don’t apply to them,vary widely, but are usually centered around driver’s licenses and car registration, tax evasion and not paying child support.

    Past that it’s hard to explain what their beliefs are because it is so vague and ever changing.








  • Dating apps are deeply, deeply enshitified because the economic incentive for them is the exact opposite of what monogamous users want. Specifically, the apps want you to keep subscribing, plus buy the super platinum plus extra added packs, but never really find someone and date them, because then you stop paying. Old school pre-sellout OKCupid had a great analysis of this in their blog, which was taken down the day they sold out.

    This is why the few sites/apps that cater to non-monogamous or event based communities are still reasonably decent, e.g FetLife, Bloom and Feeld, though Feeld is partially down the enshitification pathway.

    I’d be really interested in seeing what a fediverse dating app would be like, something that didn’t have the financial incentive to enshitify, and maybe had a match/search system like old-school OKC.

    EDIT: missing word.