Of course, but OOP is typically about putting methods on classes, inheritance of behaviour etc.

JS Objects aren’t typically used that way, they tend to be used as pure data containers. At least, that’s how we mostly use them.

Occasionally, we’ll use objects to simplify passing multiple arguments including arrow functions, but I’d say that doesn’t really count unless the arrow function mutates the object it’s a part of.

I’ve worked on projects with 10 000+ lines of typescript and maybe 3 classes total.

I’d been using Geometric Weather for many years, and I noticed a few weeks ago that it was misbehaving, not fetching data sometimes. I didn’t realise it had not had an update for almost 3 years!

I had switched to Google’s weather app, but maybe I’ll switch to this instead. Thanks for the heads-up.

I didn’t know Mullvad did a DNS service as well as a VPN, let alone that it has some ad blocking profiles. Thanks for that!

I didn’t ask for this. 😭

Not so sure about that, a quick search through my emails reveals emails from mend.io and codesandbox.io that had no trouble getting to me.

That said, I have found that even some sites that have .io don’t have it in their emails, they use a slightly different domain.

So maybe some sites have been whitelisted or it’s one of many heuristics Google uses.

For React, you can use React Router. That doesn’t mean you’ll do it well though.

It’s tough.

As someone who has used this app for at least 6 years, I am very sad to see this happen.

I’m surprised they weren’t able to get away with it after the change in extensions a couple versions ago. By not shipping extensions that have copyrighted content that should have been enough, similar to how emulators, services like Plex and torrenting applications survive.

It’s effectively just a comic / manga reader that can be used for piracy when the right extensions are added.

Apparently that wasn’t enough, and I can’t blame open source devs for not wanting to start a legal battle with a profit-earning company.

For now, the app does allow you to add external repository’s (list of extensions for various sources) that are still being updated, and I believe there are at least a few forks of the project that will survive for now.

All I can say is great work to the dev team for sticking with us until now and I wish you luck in your future ventures.

One problem I have with it is that it’s harder than ever to get to the members list. You have to click a thing at the top of the screen rather than just swiping from the right.

Otherwise I’m mostly happy.

I live in the UK, and because of Brexit we won’t get this. Thanks Nigel Farage.

And users are fully within their rights to circumvent the blocks

This is factually false (depending on your country).

From a quick Google search (ironic) the following seems to be true:

Blocking is not, in itself, illegal. However, circumventing restrictions on content, like what YouTube has added recently, is.

See this article: https://blockadblock.com/adblocking/adblockers-dont-break-the-law-except-when-they-do/

Oh wow that really is expensive. Americans do make more money on average than Europeans, but goddamn does your stuff cost a lot of money sometimes.

I think it’s €15 here?

EDIT:

Ah, for the family plan. Just reread. Not sure what that is here.

I hadn’t thought of it from a privacy perspective.

I couldn’t imagine using YouTube not signed in because of the dogs**t recommendations you get then. I imagine if you’re signed in the privacy loss is not significantly less than if you paid for Premium too.

I also use GMail so I’m already f***ed from that. I’ve basically given up on privacy at any other time than when I want to do private things, and I use a VPN and private browser.

Controversial take but:

• YouTube are fully within their rights to crack down on adblockers, as they have done in the past. Content delivery is not free, and they are not a charity.
• YouTube provides two ways to “pay” for your content: with ads, or by paying for premium.
• Tech companies have an unhealthy habit of making things free or cheap to gain a userbase, then increasing the price. The biggest problem with this imo is that it sets expectations with users that these things should be free
• I am not going to get into an argument about what price is “fair” or whether Google can “afford it”. All I know is that for now, they continue to run YouTube, but nothing stops them from shutting it all down tomorrow if they decide it’s not profitable enough.

As for myself personally, I watched YouTube with ads for the last 2 or 3 years, and more recently I decided to start paying for YouTube Premium.

YouTube Premium made sense for me because:

• I was spending more than 3 hours a day on YouTube (in the background or as the thing I’m actively watching.
• I could afford it now that my financial situation had improved
• Creators get significantly more money from YouTube Premium watchers (or so I’ve heard)

Before all of that, I used to use YouTube Vanced (RIP) and NewPipe, both great though not entirely legit ways of bypassing ads and downloading videos. I still use the latter to archive the really good content I come across.

If you’re ok to pay for YouTube, but it’s too expensive for the value you get out of it, there are alternative approaches. You can spoof your location and buy YouTube Premium in another country, like Turkey or India, and get it for as low as $2 a month. Google doesn’t crack down on this much at the time of writing.

Note that there are also blind users on Lemmy. (They left Reddit partially because they weren’t well supported there).

It’s a good idea to transcribe your picture / video posts into the text description.

Getting water to places that don’t have access to fresh water is not a minor inconvenience.

Ah! They do an audio puzzle apparently. For Google captchas at least.

https://support.google.com/recaptcha/answer/6175971?hl=en

Question: how do you make captchas work for blind people?

As annoying as this is, you are meant to use a comparer.

mapped.sort((a, b) => {
  if (a.value > b.value) {
    return 1;
  }
  if (a.value < b.value) {
    return -1;
  }
  return 0;
});

Ah nepotism.

Not sure where you live, but I find it pretty wild you can fire someone without notice with no egregious misconduct.