That sounds like someone who topped out with highschool level programming tried to implement a hash algorithm.

That’s because YAML syntax is a superset of JSON. Any YAML parser should also accept JSON, not just the one k8s uses.

I know I’m not the only one but I’ll say it anyway:

Altoids Sours.

I just went through this exact process (not for the first time) two weeks ago with a bug in the golang standard library. Fun times. Deep in the dependency stack of a container build my team doesn’t own so who knows when I’ll get a fixed version.

OK

Somehow it still has a cult like Apple

Is that a Lemmy community… ?

They did. That’s why Beeper Mini exists.

https://github.com/JJTech0130/pypush

https://jjtech.dev/reverse-engineering/imessage-explained/

https://www.wired.com/story/beeper-android-iphone-texting-blue-bubbles/

XPS are the exception to the rule of Dell’s quality, really. I guess the Precisions were also half decent, but I never bothered with them - they were ThinkPads but worse for the same price. Everything else is mediocre to bad.

GNU Network Object Model Environment

The idea of a emoji is to sound more human, that’s why Ai chat bots use them at the end of their answers, to sound more human and more friendly

This is how you feel about it, but you’re posting in a place full of humans who don’t communicate that way. It’s fine that you like to, but you won’t have much luck appealing to a community by calling their norms less-human and unfriendly.

Yes

Which leads me to wonder when it will be standard procedure for cameras to digitally sign their footage.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/10/leicas-9125-camera-automatically-stores-authenticity-proving-metadata/

The first stills camera that digitally signs its photos is here. Leica is part of a tech consortium developing this as a standard and other major photography brands are also members, so hopefully this catches on and becomes standard, and expands to video.

Good translation. It is indeed “the search box”, or rather “the box of search”

Example? They gave you the exact thing to run.

MX Clears.

Ayy, another Tex Shinobi user. Sweet.

Take a look at the global human population chart over the last few millenia. Things can seem sustainable when there are a million people on the planet. When there are 8 billion things are a bit different.

1. Website requires user to visit using particular browser
2. User refuses to use said browser
3. ???
4. No profit

Sure. And the further a fork diverges from upstream the more difficult maintenance becomes. My point is that relying on the open source model to fork projects making hostile changes only works so long as the community is actually able to maintain the fork(s), and so long as those forks actually have a reasonable chance of being adopted. It’s equally important, if not even more important, to try to ensure these large projects steer in consumer friendly directions than to react and fork to try to remove anti-consumer features.

Google has enough market and mind share that they can push this and it’s a real risk of becoming an anti-consumer standard regardless of any attempts to maintain a fork.

So what do I think we, as a body of users of the Internet, should do? Simple. Stop using Google Chrome and any other Chromium based browsers. Google has the ability to push these changes and make them defacto standards (and later, codified standards) because we collectively give them the power to by using Chromium downstreams.