• WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well then make it impossible to transfer the copyright. In most jurisdiction it’s not possible anyway. You can only licence it, not transfer.

    I guess it might be difficult to figure out shared copyright in teamwork, but indie teams work just fine, and it’s still a better option than corpus sitting on a golden pile of IPs.

    • Pigeon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like the idea of non-transferable copyrights a lot. That would make the “this is motivation for innovation / just protects inventors and artists” claim a lot more believable to me. I don’t think it should even be passable to descendents/“estates”.

      And maybe also disallow “our employees’ inventions/creative work copyright automatically goes to the company” clauses. This would be… Waaaay more complicated to sort out, but still worth thinking about imo.

      • cavemeat@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That sounds a good solution to me, and it would fix many of the issues with modern copyright law. Although I feel “lost profits” for companies would mean that this would never be implemented.