Eh… your arguement sound disingenuous here. It is absolutely possible to delineate the court of public opinion from the official court.
They both bear ramifications. They are also both capable of apt judgements, despite their flaws.
Edit. The push back in defense of LMG seems to he 'not enough evidence '. I will argue, again, that the whole point is that evidence comes after discovery.
If i were an employer in LMG’s position, i would be propping up the former employee while also evidencing my lack of guilt. Linus is doing neither.
Oh, that. Yeah, she’s got a rather famous aversion to clothing. I think she said wearing it makes her anxious, or something like that, but I don’t remember exactly.
expired
Her verbiage indicates she is self immolating with her disclosures. She would need to be playing a super long con, to be doing this maliciously, imo.
expired
Eh… your arguement sound disingenuous here. It is absolutely possible to delineate the court of public opinion from the official court.
They both bear ramifications. They are also both capable of apt judgements, despite their flaws.
Edit. The push back in defense of LMG seems to he 'not enough evidence '. I will argue, again, that the whole point is that evidence comes after discovery.
If i were an employer in LMG’s position, i would be propping up the former employee while also evidencing my lack of guilt. Linus is doing neither.
expired
Oh ok then, that totally excuses the behaviour from linus and lmg. My bad.
expired
Why, what did she do?
expired
Oh, that. Yeah, she’s got a rather famous aversion to clothing. I think she said wearing it makes her anxious, or something like that, but I don’t remember exactly.
expired
That’s a rather uncharitable interpretation. Do you have any evidence to support it?
expired
i checked out her videos because of this comment, they seem pretty cool! hope u get over yr fear of boobs ^_^
expired