• gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know I would feel awful about.

      Can you imagine the absolute torrent of psychotic conspiracy theories the MAGATS would spew until the end of time?

    • normanwall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If he dies of a heart attack the day before he’s convicted it would be due to the stress caused by his own terrible actions and would sum up his life perfectly because somehow he still avoids the full repercussions

      • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah obviously.

        But the day before he got convicted? 2 days after that, or hell, years ago, no complicated feelings at all.

        I would feel like he somehow died to get out of being convicted lmao

        • explodicle@local106.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even if he gets convicted, I wouldn’t put it past a centrist Democrat to pardon him for unity or some bullshit.

            • explodicle@local106.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t think the left would be very surprised, we’d just keep focusing on direct action. Centrist Democrats already DGAF if we’re mad.

              Liberals would call it “unacceptable” for a few months, maybe do a couple protests, and then continue to vote for the people who got him pardoned.

              Nothing would change.

              • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Isn’t anyone disturbed by that? Without extreme action from the left and no legal pushback from the Democrats, that would mean the right could do whatever the hell it wants without consequence, including genocide.

                Why aren’t we overthrowing them?

                • explodicle@local106.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They already got away with indigenous genocide without consequence, so I can certainly believe it.

                  Overthrowing them is a huge prisoner’s dilemma. We can barely even discuss specifics without getting the whole instance censored. The first person to fire a shot would likely act alone, and spend the rest of their life in prison.

                  I think the most realistic solution is p2p assassination markets built on top of blockchains, like Bitcoin Hivemind. That would avoid centralized organizations for which the leaders/admins are easy to bribe or threaten.

                  We’ve already seen what they do to our heroes. Don’t be a hero.