dyen49k@kbin.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThey are watchingmedia.kbin.socialimagemessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up11.15Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.13Karrow-down1imageThey are watchingmedia.kbin.socialdyen49k@kbin.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square105fedilink
minus-squarejarfil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThat’s BS notation. If you want Cartesian, just use 3i+1j, no need for some impossible √-1 that you then redefine some operations for, just so it becomes orthogonal to R.
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThe nice thing about 𝑖 = √-̅1̅ is that you don’t need to redefine any operations for it, ℐ𝓂 is “automatically” orthogonal to ℛℯ.
That’s BS notation. If you want Cartesian, just use 3i+1j, no need for some impossible √-1 that you then redefine some operations for, just so it becomes orthogonal to R.
The nice thing about 𝑖 = √-̅1̅ is that you don’t need to redefine any operations for it, ℐ𝓂 is “automatically” orthogonal to ℛℯ.