• HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Its not all. I have found that companies that did not own much real estate have embraced wfh big time and have wound down any contracts they had. Ones stuck with offices they own or maybe long term contracts seem to but I doubt its going to be a good long term call. The only possible usage it might have is to encourage people to quit so you can reduce the workforce without lay offs but that is a crazy strategy as you are losing at best random folks and at worst the best you have.

    • rjthyen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I overlooked reducing workforce as a possibility. I’m not in the corporate world at all so I have no actual insight on anything. I’ve just been confused by something I’d consider a win-win being done away with by a lot of companies.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        yeah everyone is confused with that. Many back to office scenarios have the people sitting in the office video conferencing all day because many of the folks they work with are not at the local office anyway.

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          And they’re in panopticon bull-pen offices where it’s impossible to hear yourself because the people next to you are also shouting on Teams.

          That’s very much my situation. 3/4 of my staff are from contracting firms based elsewhere. So regardless of where I work, most of my meetings are via video conferencing.