• PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      What she said isn’t a threat. To say otherwise is willful ignorance.

      By your own logic you’re making a threat.

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          She’s saying someone else will do something to them for their actions as a consequence, just like you are saying someone else will do something to her as a consequence. She’s not saying she’s going to do it herself, just like you’re not saying you’re going to do something to her yourself are you?

          • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            No one said they were going to do something to her as a consequence. What are you talking about?

            Saying someone was killed and you’re next is a pretty specific threat.

            Like I don’t agree necessarily that it is a jailable offense, but stop pretending it’s not a threat

            • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              You said, “so don’t make empty treats” in response to something happening to her. You’re saying that if someone makes empty threats then something will happen. That’s a threat of action.

              • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                No. They, not me, said

                “So don’t make empty threats?”

                With emphasis on empty asking wait you can’t even make empty threats? But you’re way too defensive to notice