• AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Yep, you’re right that she wouldn’t win and you would be propping up Trump by voting for her. I don’t see any “liberals” saying she’ll stop the genocide, either. I only see you bringing up that point in this thread.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Read the thread, there are plenty of people on this thread pretending Harris will be better for Palestine, which is a lie.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        There are two people, by definition one is better. So you saying her being better is a lie must mean you think Trump is better. Which is insane.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          This is a new level of liberal gymnastics, lmao.

          Materially, if Trump and Kamala approve the same genocidal weapon shipments, regardless of their individual feelings, what changes? Do you think Trump has fascist magic that makes the bombs Kamala promised to send anyways more deadly?

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            No, but if you look beyond a single isolated thing you’re crusading for your realize that sending weapons over seas isn’t the only power the president has. The president can make the world much worse beyond a single conflict in the middle east.

            You can’t see being that single issue. Other people are looking at long reaching impact. If my your admission they both want to send bombs, then look at what else they are doing. Try to effect some level of change and take action instead of just judging and bitching.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              A bit nasty to describe genocide as “a single conflict in the middle east,” but regardless, the GOP and DNC are aligned on foreign policy.

              • Lightor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 days ago

                Nasty? Is it multiple conflicts, is it not in the middle east? Or are you just mad and want to use inflammatory words to drive a discussion off feelings not reality.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  The reality is that it’s genocide, using passive language is a rhetorical strategy to downplay the internationally recognized genocide.

                  • Lightor@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 days ago

                    I’m not down playing anything, it’s you assuming and wanting to be extreme. Why don’t you call it the murder of innocent children, are you trying to play it down by using a single word?

                    Jesus, it’s not even about the issues with people like you, it’s just an excuse to feel righteous and go after people.