• m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    MKV is just the container though, what really matter are the codecs and their parameters. Transforming the container (aka remuxing) doesn’t require a lot of processing power, and in fact some platforms like Plex will remux an MKV to another format on-the-fly to another container if the player doesn’t natively support MKV but otherwise support the codecs used inside with little effort required.

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Usenet.

    EDIT: I still don’t understand the general dislike towards Usenet in this community. Once I took the plunge, I honestly couldn’t dream of going back to torrents again. It’s just so damn convenient and reliable.

    • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it’s a bit unfair too, buddy. Usenet with the *arr stack and Jellyfin is such a great experience with all that automation, once you’ve got it all setup. Mine’s setup to preference H265 and 5.1 channel audio, and specific resolution/quality. I mean, yeah you can access much the same content completely for free using torrents instead, but it feels like going back to the steam age now to do it all manually.

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can automate the same way with torrents, can’t you? I mean, you can even use indexers of both types at the same time.

        • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, you can integrate torrents into the stack, afaik. But due to some technical considerations I don’t like to run a VPN on my media server, and in my country you definitely need one for torrents.

          • Grippler@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            due to some technical considerations I don’t like to run a VPN on my media server

            What’s the reasons against using a VPN here?

            • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Getting into the weeds a bit here lol. I do use a VPN on my personal PC, but on the media server where I have my *arr stack, I’ve found that using a VPN, even with split tunneling configured, allows certain TV websites to detect I’m using a VPN and block streaming content. If I wasn’t using a DNS proxy, or if I ran the stack on a separate server, it probably wouldn’t be an issue, but I’m not so it is :p. I’ll add that if I am using only Usenet then I prefer not to run a VPN since it’s reasonably safe IMO to raw dog that content, since a VPN always has some overhead involved in terms of bandwidth and latency.

              • Grippler@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Why not just run the torrenting stack behind the VPN in a separate docker container? Then the rest of your media server is completely unaffected by the VPN and no need for any split tunneling.

                • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  That’s a good suggestion, I just haven’t had the motivation to get that setup yet since Usenet currently meets my needs. But I’m sure it would work, yes.

    • matey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Once I got into decent private trackers, I stopped paying for Usenet. That said, it was great for when I was starting out.

  • Joejoe582@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The question should be: “Where NOT to find movies to download in high quality in .mkv file format?”

      • kaboom36@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You will have an easier time finding quality media in .mkv than not, its one of, if not the most popular formats out there

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can download in whatever format is available for any given movie. Often movies are available in multiple formats, especially the popular ones. DM your email address amd I can invite you to a private tracker but only if you promise to keep a good ratio.

    Also I’m sure some other commenter is literally going to say “mkv is a container not a format” but whatever, if you want mkvs the movie or show you want has to have an mkv available.

  • minibyte@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Look for “remux” – that’s the file direct from Bluray. If you need an invite to torrentleech DM me an email address to send it to.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why mkv? Use a torrent site (with ublock, etc) or bring up a streaming site and use yt-dlp