• cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I am out of the loop honestly, but i was sure that surgery was not an option until after puberty due to biological reasons. Am I wrong?

    • bork@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Also, for context, media outlets (and that one TX doc) have been including puberty blocking implants as “surgery”. It’s incredibly dishonest.

    • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Basically, some trans people want to have bottom surgery before going to college. And wrt top surgery, some trans masc teens want access to the same medical options as cis male teens.

      But the New York Terfs don’t like that

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Not sure about biological reasons. Its possible I spose but without more medical knowledge. In not sure how removing / changing organs as they grow developmentally effects the final outcome.

      The argument has always been about the maturity of the candidate. And the idea that surgery is not practically reversible. Vs the mental harm of growing up in a body that dose not match your perceived gender.

      But I have to wonder. As In the UK and I am sure the US hormone blockers are also being attacked with often questionable medical evidence as to the harm the may do when used on developing teenagers.

      Given In the UK it is definatly not legal for anyone under the age of consent to have gender reasignment surgery. The current attacks seem to be aimed at making it impossible for that surgery to achive its best success once it is legal.