Googling his name reveals a list of other highly reputable sources, such as Metro.co.uk, and instagram. Honestly, it wouldn’t surprise me if the kid simply doesn’t exist.
By all means, reveal the evidence that was presented which you claim is being suppressed. I have no problems admitting I’m wrong in the face of substantiated evidence.
Well I mean, if msn.com know that no evidence was presented there has to be a source for that right? Like amnesty international or something. Anything other than these very trustworthy, word-for-word identical, self-referencing articles that have appeared in the last 5 days.
I could take it all at face value, but then I used to do that back when we were invading Iraq and Afganistan and it turned out that 99% of what I was reading was utter bullshit.
Although it does also mention the case was also about him joining a terrorist organisation which was planning an attack on Russian rail infrastructure.
You’re right to be skeptical, the source is RFA/Radio Svoboda and their article also mentions that Memorial calls him a political prisoner, and it’s an “international human rights society” (another NGO) where two of its founders wrote for RFA or were caught (and admitted to) receiving funding from foreign sources. There needs to be more information before baselessly parroting such propaganda.
Says msn.com, that highly reputable web tabloid.
Googling his name reveals a list of other highly reputable sources, such as Metro.co.uk, and instagram. Honestly, it wouldn’t surprise me if the kid simply doesn’t exist.
By all means, reveal the evidence that was presented which you claim is being suppressed. I have no problems admitting I’m wrong in the face of substantiated evidence.
Well I mean, if msn.com know that no evidence was presented there has to be a source for that right? Like amnesty international or something. Anything other than these very trustworthy, word-for-word identical, self-referencing articles that have appeared in the last 5 days.
I could take it all at face value, but then I used to do that back when we were invading Iraq and Afganistan and it turned out that 99% of what I was reading was utter bullshit.
This argument used in current context…
Are you naive or just shilling?
Best I could find, myself not being fluent in Russian, is this human rights/legal organization still operating in Russia proper which describes the conviction as a result of delivering homemade fliers saying ‘do we really need this kind of President’.
Much better source.
Although it does also mention the case was also about him joining a terrorist organisation which was planning an attack on Russian rail infrastructure.
Google Translate Version
You’re right to be skeptical, the source is RFA/Radio Svoboda and their article also mentions that Memorial calls him a political prisoner, and it’s an “international human rights society” (another NGO) where two of its founders wrote for RFA or were caught (and admitted to) receiving funding from foreign sources. There needs to be more information before baselessly parroting such propaganda.